Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model

There is wide consensus that synaptic plasticity (prominently long-term potentiation; LTP) is the underlying mechanism for learning and memory storage (cf Nabavi 2014). Open issues include the molecular pathways and networks and structural processes leading to functional and structural changes at th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benjamin Auffarth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/conf.fnsys.2014.05.00048/full
_version_ 1818305234618810368
author Benjamin Auffarth
author_facet Benjamin Auffarth
author_sort Benjamin Auffarth
collection DOAJ
description There is wide consensus that synaptic plasticity (prominently long-term potentiation; LTP) is the underlying mechanism for learning and memory storage (cf Nabavi 2014). Open issues include the molecular pathways and networks and structural processes leading to functional and structural changes at the synaptic and dendritic levels in terms of channels and spines. Synaptic tagging and capture (STC; Frey and Morris 1997; Redondo and Morris 2011) is a predominant model for investigating LTP. According to the STC hypothesis, the mechanisms underlying LTP can be separated into independent processes for the generation of plasticity-related products (PRPs) and the setting of a synaptic tag. We know from many studies that dendritic branches act as computational units, given the availability of ionic mechanisms and local compartmentalization of synaptic interactions (Branco and Hausser 2010; Poirazi et al 2003; Frey, 2001). In order to investigate the effects of dendritic compartmentalization on memory formation, we implemented a model of STC in the NEURON platform, incorporating both mechanisms for short-term plasticity and late LTP (l-LTP). Synapses are confined within spines and include numerous biophysical channels and receptors. Our l-LTP mechanism demonstrates the association of memories to synapses and dendrites. We show that local diffusion leads to increases in synaptic weights for neighboring spines, showing the plausibility of the synaptic clustering in memory storage (Poirazi 2001; Govindarajan 2006). The first figure shows the dendritic excitatory postsynaptic potential on tetanic stimulation of 2x100Hz. The second figure shows consolidated synaptic plasticity at the stimulated synapse (blue), and two neighboring synapses (green and red).
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:23:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a274c16ea664efa9a59420bb8f9b1a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5137
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:23:21Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-8a274c16ea664efa9a59420bb8f9b1a82022-12-21T23:56:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372014-06-01810.3389/conf.fnsys.2014.05.0004882076Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical modelBenjamin Auffarth0IMBB, FORTHThere is wide consensus that synaptic plasticity (prominently long-term potentiation; LTP) is the underlying mechanism for learning and memory storage (cf Nabavi 2014). Open issues include the molecular pathways and networks and structural processes leading to functional and structural changes at the synaptic and dendritic levels in terms of channels and spines. Synaptic tagging and capture (STC; Frey and Morris 1997; Redondo and Morris 2011) is a predominant model for investigating LTP. According to the STC hypothesis, the mechanisms underlying LTP can be separated into independent processes for the generation of plasticity-related products (PRPs) and the setting of a synaptic tag. We know from many studies that dendritic branches act as computational units, given the availability of ionic mechanisms and local compartmentalization of synaptic interactions (Branco and Hausser 2010; Poirazi et al 2003; Frey, 2001). In order to investigate the effects of dendritic compartmentalization on memory formation, we implemented a model of STC in the NEURON platform, incorporating both mechanisms for short-term plasticity and late LTP (l-LTP). Synapses are confined within spines and include numerous biophysical channels and receptors. Our l-LTP mechanism demonstrates the association of memories to synapses and dendrites. We show that local diffusion leads to increases in synaptic weights for neighboring spines, showing the plausibility of the synaptic clustering in memory storage (Poirazi 2001; Govindarajan 2006). The first figure shows the dendritic excitatory postsynaptic potential on tetanic stimulation of 2x100Hz. The second figure shows consolidated synaptic plasticity at the stimulated synapse (blue), and two neighboring synapses (green and red).http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/conf.fnsys.2014.05.00048/fullDendritesHippocampusNeuronal PlasticityLTPpyramidal neuronfunctional connectivityCA1compartmental modelingCA1 pyramidal neuronLTP (Long Term Potentiation)STP
spellingShingle Benjamin Auffarth
Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Dendrites
Hippocampus
Neuronal Plasticity
LTP
pyramidal neuron
functional connectivity
CA1
compartmental modeling
CA1 pyramidal neuron
LTP (Long Term Potentiation)
STP
title Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
title_full Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
title_fullStr Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
title_full_unstemmed Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
title_short Synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
title_sort synaptic tagging and capture in a biophysical model
topic Dendrites
Hippocampus
Neuronal Plasticity
LTP
pyramidal neuron
functional connectivity
CA1
compartmental modeling
CA1 pyramidal neuron
LTP (Long Term Potentiation)
STP
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/conf.fnsys.2014.05.00048/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminauffarth synaptictaggingandcaptureinabiophysicalmodel