SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a major cause of liver‐related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Liver fibrosis stage, a key component of NASH, has been linked to the risk of mortality and liver‐related clinical outcomes. Currently there are no validated noninvasive diagnostics that can diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Luo, Samir Wadhawan, Alex Greenfield, Benjamin E. Decato, Abdul M. Oseini, Rebecca Collen, Diane E. Shevell, John Thompson, Gabor Jarai, Edgar D. Charles, Arun J. Sanyal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health/LWW 2021-05-01
Series:Hepatology Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1670
_version_ 1797936759132127232
author Yi Luo
Samir Wadhawan
Alex Greenfield
Benjamin E. Decato
Abdul M. Oseini
Rebecca Collen
Diane E. Shevell
John Thompson
Gabor Jarai
Edgar D. Charles
Arun J. Sanyal
author_facet Yi Luo
Samir Wadhawan
Alex Greenfield
Benjamin E. Decato
Abdul M. Oseini
Rebecca Collen
Diane E. Shevell
John Thompson
Gabor Jarai
Edgar D. Charles
Arun J. Sanyal
author_sort Yi Luo
collection DOAJ
description Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a major cause of liver‐related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Liver fibrosis stage, a key component of NASH, has been linked to the risk of mortality and liver‐related clinical outcomes. Currently there are no validated noninvasive diagnostics that can differentiate between fibrosis stages in patients with NASH; many existing tests do not reflect underlying disease pathophysiology. Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to identify patients at high‐risk of NASH with advanced fibrosis. This was a retrospective study of patients with histologically proven NASH with fibrosis stages 0‐4. The SOMAscan proteomics platform was used to quantify 1,305 serum proteins in a discovery cohort (n = 113). In patients with advanced (stages 3‐4) versus early fibrosis (stages 0‐2), 97 proteins with diverse biological functions were differentially expressed. Next, fibrosis‐stage classification models were explored using a machine learning–based approach to prioritize the biomarkers for further evaluation. A four‐protein model differentiated patients with stage 0‐1 versus stage 2‐4 fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.74), while a 12‐protein classifier differentiated advanced versus early fibrosis (AUROC = 0.83). Subsequently, the model’s performance was validated in two independent cohorts (n = 71 and n = 32) with similar results (AUROC = 0.74‐0.78). Our advanced fibrosis model performed similarly to or better than Fibrosis‐4 index, aspartate aminotransferase–to‐platelet ratio index, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score–based models for all three cohorts. Conclusion: A SOMAscan proteomics‐based exploratory classifier for advanced fibrosis, consisting of biomarkers that reflect the complexity of NASH pathophysiology, demonstrated similar performance in independent validation cohorts and performed similarly or better than Fibrosis‐4 index, aspartate aminotransferase–to‐platelet ratio index, and NAFLD fibrosis score. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical utility of these biomarker panels in patients with NAFLD.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:35:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a3abd3b1df443e39f2096123e2609aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-254X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:35:05Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health/LWW
record_format Article
series Hepatology Communications
spelling doaj.art-8a3abd3b1df443e39f2096123e2609aa2023-02-02T01:49:55ZengWolters Kluwer Health/LWWHepatology Communications2471-254X2021-05-015576077310.1002/hep4.1670SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASHYi Luo0Samir Wadhawan1Alex Greenfield2Benjamin E. Decato3Abdul M. Oseini4Rebecca Collen5Diane E. Shevell6John Thompson7Gabor Jarai8Edgar D. Charles9Arun J. Sanyal10Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USAVirginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USAVirginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USABristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USAVirginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USANonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a major cause of liver‐related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Liver fibrosis stage, a key component of NASH, has been linked to the risk of mortality and liver‐related clinical outcomes. Currently there are no validated noninvasive diagnostics that can differentiate between fibrosis stages in patients with NASH; many existing tests do not reflect underlying disease pathophysiology. Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to identify patients at high‐risk of NASH with advanced fibrosis. This was a retrospective study of patients with histologically proven NASH with fibrosis stages 0‐4. The SOMAscan proteomics platform was used to quantify 1,305 serum proteins in a discovery cohort (n = 113). In patients with advanced (stages 3‐4) versus early fibrosis (stages 0‐2), 97 proteins with diverse biological functions were differentially expressed. Next, fibrosis‐stage classification models were explored using a machine learning–based approach to prioritize the biomarkers for further evaluation. A four‐protein model differentiated patients with stage 0‐1 versus stage 2‐4 fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.74), while a 12‐protein classifier differentiated advanced versus early fibrosis (AUROC = 0.83). Subsequently, the model’s performance was validated in two independent cohorts (n = 71 and n = 32) with similar results (AUROC = 0.74‐0.78). Our advanced fibrosis model performed similarly to or better than Fibrosis‐4 index, aspartate aminotransferase–to‐platelet ratio index, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score–based models for all three cohorts. Conclusion: A SOMAscan proteomics‐based exploratory classifier for advanced fibrosis, consisting of biomarkers that reflect the complexity of NASH pathophysiology, demonstrated similar performance in independent validation cohorts and performed similarly or better than Fibrosis‐4 index, aspartate aminotransferase–to‐platelet ratio index, and NAFLD fibrosis score. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical utility of these biomarker panels in patients with NAFLD.https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1670
spellingShingle Yi Luo
Samir Wadhawan
Alex Greenfield
Benjamin E. Decato
Abdul M. Oseini
Rebecca Collen
Diane E. Shevell
John Thompson
Gabor Jarai
Edgar D. Charles
Arun J. Sanyal
SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
Hepatology Communications
title SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
title_full SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
title_fullStr SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
title_full_unstemmed SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
title_short SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated With Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH
title_sort somascan proteomics identifies serum biomarkers associated with liver fibrosis in patients with nash
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1670
work_keys_str_mv AT yiluo somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT samirwadhawan somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT alexgreenfield somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT benjaminedecato somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT abdulmoseini somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT rebeccacollen somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT dianeeshevell somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT johnthompson somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT gaborjarai somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT edgardcharles somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash
AT arunjsanyal somascanproteomicsidentifiesserumbiomarkersassociatedwithliverfibrosisinpatientswithnash