Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accumulation and elimination in both wildlife and humans is largely attributed to PFAS interactions with proteins, including but not limited to organic anion transporters (OATs), fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs), and serum proteins such as albumin. In wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacqueline Bangma, T.C. Guillette, Paige A. Bommarito, Carla Ng, Jessica L. Reiner, Andrew B. Lindstrom, Mark J. Strynar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Environment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021006620
_version_ 1798034384217964544
author Jacqueline Bangma
T.C. Guillette
Paige A. Bommarito
Carla Ng
Jessica L. Reiner
Andrew B. Lindstrom
Mark J. Strynar
author_facet Jacqueline Bangma
T.C. Guillette
Paige A. Bommarito
Carla Ng
Jessica L. Reiner
Andrew B. Lindstrom
Mark J. Strynar
author_sort Jacqueline Bangma
collection DOAJ
description Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accumulation and elimination in both wildlife and humans is largely attributed to PFAS interactions with proteins, including but not limited to organic anion transporters (OATs), fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs), and serum proteins such as albumin. In wildlife, changes in the biotic and abiotic environment (e.g. salinity, temperature, reproductive stage, and health status) often lead to dynamic and responsive physiological changes that alter the prevalence and location of many proteins, including PFAS-related proteins. Therefore, we hypothesize that if key PFAS-related proteins are impacted as a result of environmentally induced as well as biologically programmed physiological changes (e.g. reproduction), then PFAS that associate with those proteins will also be impacted. Changes in tissue distribution across tissues of PFAS due to these dynamics may have implications for wildlife studies where these chemicals are measured in biological matrices (e.g., serum, feathers, eggs). For example, failure to account for factors contributing to PFAS variability in a tissue may result in exposure misclassification as measured concentrations may not reflect average exposure levels. The goal of this review is to share general information with the PFAS research community on what biotic and abiotic changes might be important to consider when designing and interpreting a biomonitoring or an ecotoxicity based wildlife study. This review will also draw on parallels from the epidemiological discipline to improve study design in wildlife research. Overall, understanding these connections between biotic and abiotic environments, dynamic protein levels, PFAS levels measured in wildlife, and epidemiology serves to strengthen study design and study interpretation and thus strengthen conclusions derived from wildlife studies for years to come.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:42:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a453aa77fe846a9897ba6e3e0ea774b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0160-4120
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:42:40Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Environment International
spelling doaj.art-8a453aa77fe846a9897ba6e3e0ea774b2022-12-22T04:04:08ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202022-01-01159107037Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlifeJacqueline Bangma0T.C. Guillette1Paige A. Bommarito2Carla Ng3Jessica L. Reiner4Andrew B. Lindstrom5Mark J. Strynar6Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; Corresponding author at: 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC 27713, USA.Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USAEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAChemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 331 Fort Johnson Rd, Charleston, SC, USACenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, USACenter for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, USAPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accumulation and elimination in both wildlife and humans is largely attributed to PFAS interactions with proteins, including but not limited to organic anion transporters (OATs), fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs), and serum proteins such as albumin. In wildlife, changes in the biotic and abiotic environment (e.g. salinity, temperature, reproductive stage, and health status) often lead to dynamic and responsive physiological changes that alter the prevalence and location of many proteins, including PFAS-related proteins. Therefore, we hypothesize that if key PFAS-related proteins are impacted as a result of environmentally induced as well as biologically programmed physiological changes (e.g. reproduction), then PFAS that associate with those proteins will also be impacted. Changes in tissue distribution across tissues of PFAS due to these dynamics may have implications for wildlife studies where these chemicals are measured in biological matrices (e.g., serum, feathers, eggs). For example, failure to account for factors contributing to PFAS variability in a tissue may result in exposure misclassification as measured concentrations may not reflect average exposure levels. The goal of this review is to share general information with the PFAS research community on what biotic and abiotic changes might be important to consider when designing and interpreting a biomonitoring or an ecotoxicity based wildlife study. This review will also draw on parallels from the epidemiological discipline to improve study design in wildlife research. Overall, understanding these connections between biotic and abiotic environments, dynamic protein levels, PFAS levels measured in wildlife, and epidemiology serves to strengthen study design and study interpretation and thus strengthen conclusions derived from wildlife studies for years to come.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021006620WildlifePFASProteinsBioticAbiotic
spellingShingle Jacqueline Bangma
T.C. Guillette
Paige A. Bommarito
Carla Ng
Jessica L. Reiner
Andrew B. Lindstrom
Mark J. Strynar
Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
Environment International
Wildlife
PFAS
Proteins
Biotic
Abiotic
title Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
title_full Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
title_fullStr Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
title_short Understanding the dynamics of physiological changes, protein expression, and PFAS in wildlife
title_sort understanding the dynamics of physiological changes protein expression and pfas in wildlife
topic Wildlife
PFAS
Proteins
Biotic
Abiotic
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021006620
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquelinebangma understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT tcguillette understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT paigeabommarito understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT carlang understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT jessicalreiner understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT andrewblindstrom understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife
AT markjstrynar understandingthedynamicsofphysiologicalchangesproteinexpressionandpfasinwildlife