Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation has been the primary treatment modality for acute DVT. However, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has recently become widely accepted as an additional therapy to anticoagu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Young Jin Choi, Dong Hyun Kim, Dong il Kim, Hyun-Yul Kim, Sang Su Lee, Hyuk Jae Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medrang 2019-03-01
Series:Vascular Specialist International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.vsijournal.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.28
_version_ 1811275207622524928
author Young Jin Choi
Dong Hyun Kim
Dong il Kim
Hyun-Yul Kim
Sang Su Lee
Hyuk Jae Jung
author_facet Young Jin Choi
Dong Hyun Kim
Dong il Kim
Hyun-Yul Kim
Sang Su Lee
Hyuk Jae Jung
author_sort Young Jin Choi
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation has been the primary treatment modality for acute DVT. However, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has recently become widely accepted as an additional therapy to anticoagulation. We assessed comparative outcomes in patients with acute DVT who underwent anticoagulation therapy alone (ACA) group and those treated with CDT group. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 149 patients with DVT from January 2011 to December 2015. We compared patients who received ACA group (n=120) and those who received CDT plus anticoagulation (CDT group, n=29). We analyzed the prevalence of lesions, thrombus removal rate in each lesion, and recurrence-free rate between the two groups. Results: We found thrombus involvement in a total of 281 lesions in the ACA group and 85 lesions in the CDT group. For the distribution of lesions in each group, those in the femoral vein accounted for 34.2% of all lesions and those in the popliteal vein accounted for 31.7%. During follow-up, the overall thrombus removal rate was 91.1% in the ACA group and 87.0% in the CDT group (P=0.273). The recurrence-free rate was higher in the CDT group in a log-rank test; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.594). Conclusion: According to our results, there was no significant difference in thrombus removal and recurrence-free rates between the CDT and ACA groups. ACA still has an important role in the treatment of DVT.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:33:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a4aee2d69734b5e93295715ba91b93a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2288-7970
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:33:54Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Medrang
record_format Article
series Vascular Specialist International
spelling doaj.art-8a4aee2d69734b5e93295715ba91b93a2022-12-22T03:12:12ZengMedrangVascular Specialist International2288-79702019-03-01351283310.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.28vsi.2019.35.1.28Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein ThrombosisYoung Jin Choi0Dong Hyun Kim1Dong il Kim2Hyun-Yul Kim3Sang Su Lee4Hyuk Jae Jung5Endovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaEndovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaEndovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaEndovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaEndovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaEndovascular and Vascular Division, Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, KoreaPurpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation has been the primary treatment modality for acute DVT. However, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has recently become widely accepted as an additional therapy to anticoagulation. We assessed comparative outcomes in patients with acute DVT who underwent anticoagulation therapy alone (ACA) group and those treated with CDT group. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 149 patients with DVT from January 2011 to December 2015. We compared patients who received ACA group (n=120) and those who received CDT plus anticoagulation (CDT group, n=29). We analyzed the prevalence of lesions, thrombus removal rate in each lesion, and recurrence-free rate between the two groups. Results: We found thrombus involvement in a total of 281 lesions in the ACA group and 85 lesions in the CDT group. For the distribution of lesions in each group, those in the femoral vein accounted for 34.2% of all lesions and those in the popliteal vein accounted for 31.7%. During follow-up, the overall thrombus removal rate was 91.1% in the ACA group and 87.0% in the CDT group (P=0.273). The recurrence-free rate was higher in the CDT group in a log-rank test; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.594). Conclusion: According to our results, there was no significant difference in thrombus removal and recurrence-free rates between the CDT and ACA groups. ACA still has an important role in the treatment of DVT.http://www.vsijournal.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.28Venous thrombosisAnticoagulantsThrombolytic therapy
spellingShingle Young Jin Choi
Dong Hyun Kim
Dong il Kim
Hyun-Yul Kim
Sang Su Lee
Hyuk Jae Jung
Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
Vascular Specialist International
Venous thrombosis
Anticoagulants
Thrombolytic therapy
title Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
title_full Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
title_short Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
title_sort comparison of treatment result between anticoagulation alone and catheter directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation in acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis
topic Venous thrombosis
Anticoagulants
Thrombolytic therapy
url http://www.vsijournal.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.28
work_keys_str_mv AT youngjinchoi comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis
AT donghyunkim comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis
AT dongilkim comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis
AT hyunyulkim comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis
AT sangsulee comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis
AT hyukjaejung comparisonoftreatmentresultbetweenanticoagulationaloneandcatheterdirectedthrombolysisplusanticoagulationinacutelowerextremitydeepveinthrombosis