Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications

In this study, different planar inductor topologies were studied to evaluate their characteristic parameters’ variation range upon approaching Fe- and Cu-based shield plates. The use of such materials can differently alter the electrical properties of planar inductors such as the inductance, resonan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fares Tounsi, Mohamed Hadj Said, Margo Hauwaert, Sinda Kaziz, Laurent A. Francis, Jean-Pierre Raskin, Denis Flandre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3514
_version_ 1797502791750516736
author Fares Tounsi
Mohamed Hadj Said
Margo Hauwaert
Sinda Kaziz
Laurent A. Francis
Jean-Pierre Raskin
Denis Flandre
author_facet Fares Tounsi
Mohamed Hadj Said
Margo Hauwaert
Sinda Kaziz
Laurent A. Francis
Jean-Pierre Raskin
Denis Flandre
author_sort Fares Tounsi
collection DOAJ
description In this study, different planar inductor topologies were studied to evaluate their characteristic parameters’ variation range upon approaching Fe- and Cu-based shield plates. The use of such materials can differently alter the electrical properties of planar inductors such as the inductance, resonant frequency, resistance, and quality factor, which could be useful in multiple devices, particularly in inductive sensing and radio-frequency (or RF) applications. To reach an optimal design, five different square topologies, including spiral, tapered, non-spiral, meander, and fractal, were built on a printed circuit board (PCB) and assessed experimentally. At the working frequency of 1 MHz, the results showed a decrease in the inductance value when approaching a Cu-based plate and an increase with Fe-based plates. The higher variation range was noticeable for double-layer topologies, which was about 60% with the Cu-based plate. Beyond an intrinsic deflection frequency, the inductance value began to decrease when approaching the ferromagnetic plate because of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). It has been shown that the FMR frequency depends on the inductor topology and is larger for the double-layer spiral one. The <i>Q</i>-factor was decreasing for all topologies but was much faster when using ferromagnetic plates because of the FMR, which intensely increases the track resistance. The resonant frequency was increasing for all double-layer topologies and decreasing for single-layer ones, which was mainly due to the percentage change in the stray capacitance compared to the inductance variation. The concept of varying inductors by metal shielding plates has great potential in a wide range of nondestructive sensing and RF applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:41:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a5397851f5245e491918877dff59d10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:41:10Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-8a5397851f5245e491918877dff59d102023-11-23T09:19:35ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-05-01229351410.3390/s22093514Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing ApplicationsFares Tounsi0Mohamed Hadj Said1Margo Hauwaert2Sinda Kaziz3Laurent A. Francis4Jean-Pierre Raskin5Denis Flandre6Sensors, Microsystems and Actuators Laboratory of Louvain (SMALL), Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSystems Integration & Emerging Energies (SI2E), National Engineering School of Sfax, University of Sfax, Route Soukra, BP 1173, Sfax 3038, TunisiaSensors, Microsystems and Actuators Laboratory of Louvain (SMALL), Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSystems Integration & Emerging Energies (SI2E), National Engineering School of Sfax, University of Sfax, Route Soukra, BP 1173, Sfax 3038, TunisiaSensors, Microsystems and Actuators Laboratory of Louvain (SMALL), Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSensors, Microsystems and Actuators Laboratory of Louvain (SMALL), Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSensors, Microsystems and Actuators Laboratory of Louvain (SMALL), Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumIn this study, different planar inductor topologies were studied to evaluate their characteristic parameters’ variation range upon approaching Fe- and Cu-based shield plates. The use of such materials can differently alter the electrical properties of planar inductors such as the inductance, resonant frequency, resistance, and quality factor, which could be useful in multiple devices, particularly in inductive sensing and radio-frequency (or RF) applications. To reach an optimal design, five different square topologies, including spiral, tapered, non-spiral, meander, and fractal, were built on a printed circuit board (PCB) and assessed experimentally. At the working frequency of 1 MHz, the results showed a decrease in the inductance value when approaching a Cu-based plate and an increase with Fe-based plates. The higher variation range was noticeable for double-layer topologies, which was about 60% with the Cu-based plate. Beyond an intrinsic deflection frequency, the inductance value began to decrease when approaching the ferromagnetic plate because of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). It has been shown that the FMR frequency depends on the inductor topology and is larger for the double-layer spiral one. The <i>Q</i>-factor was decreasing for all topologies but was much faster when using ferromagnetic plates because of the FMR, which intensely increases the track resistance. The resonant frequency was increasing for all double-layer topologies and decreasing for single-layer ones, which was mainly due to the percentage change in the stray capacitance compared to the inductance variation. The concept of varying inductors by metal shielding plates has great potential in a wide range of nondestructive sensing and RF applications.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3514planar inductor topologieseddy-current microsensortuned inductorsproximity measurementferromagnetic resonance (FMR)non-destructive evaluation
spellingShingle Fares Tounsi
Mohamed Hadj Said
Margo Hauwaert
Sinda Kaziz
Laurent A. Francis
Jean-Pierre Raskin
Denis Flandre
Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
Sensors
planar inductor topologies
eddy-current microsensor
tuned inductors
proximity measurement
ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)
non-destructive evaluation
title Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
title_full Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
title_fullStr Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
title_full_unstemmed Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
title_short Variation Range of Different Inductor Topologies with Shields for RF and Inductive Sensing Applications
title_sort variation range of different inductor topologies with shields for rf and inductive sensing applications
topic planar inductor topologies
eddy-current microsensor
tuned inductors
proximity measurement
ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)
non-destructive evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3514
work_keys_str_mv AT farestounsi variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT mohamedhadjsaid variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT margohauwaert variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT sindakaziz variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT laurentafrancis variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT jeanpierreraskin variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications
AT denisflandre variationrangeofdifferentinductortopologieswithshieldsforrfandinductivesensingapplications