Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising

Monochromatic images are used mainly in cases where the intensity of the received signal is examined. The identification of the observed objects as well as the estimation of intensity emitted by them depends largely on the precision of light measurement in image pixels. Unfortunately, this type of i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik, Krzysztof Bernacki, Adam Popowicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/12/5538
_version_ 1827735680318439424
author Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik
Krzysztof Bernacki
Adam Popowicz
author_facet Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik
Krzysztof Bernacki
Adam Popowicz
author_sort Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik
collection DOAJ
description Monochromatic images are used mainly in cases where the intensity of the received signal is examined. The identification of the observed objects as well as the estimation of intensity emitted by them depends largely on the precision of light measurement in image pixels. Unfortunately, this type of imaging is often affected by noise, which significantly degrades the quality of the results. In order to reduce it, numerous deterministic algorithms are used, with Non-Local-Means and Block-Matching-3D being the most widespread and treated as the reference point of the current state-of-the-art. Our article focuses on the utilization of machine learning (ML) for the denoising of monochromatic images in multiple data availability scenarios, including those with no access to noise-free data. For this purpose, a simple autoencoder architecture was chosen and checked for various training approaches on two large and widely used image datasets: MNIST and CIFAR-10. The results show that the method of training as well as architecture and the similarity of images within the image dataset significantly affect the ML-based denoising. However, even without access to any clear data, the performance of such algorithms is frequently well above the current state-of-the-art; therefore, they should be considered for monochromatic image denoising.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:57:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a81696945a44aca80489936e0b72abb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:57:11Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-8a81696945a44aca80489936e0b72abb2023-11-18T12:32:31ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-06-012312553810.3390/s23125538Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image DenoisingPiotr Jóźwik-Wabik0Krzysztof Bernacki1Adam Popowicz2Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandMonochromatic images are used mainly in cases where the intensity of the received signal is examined. The identification of the observed objects as well as the estimation of intensity emitted by them depends largely on the precision of light measurement in image pixels. Unfortunately, this type of imaging is often affected by noise, which significantly degrades the quality of the results. In order to reduce it, numerous deterministic algorithms are used, with Non-Local-Means and Block-Matching-3D being the most widespread and treated as the reference point of the current state-of-the-art. Our article focuses on the utilization of machine learning (ML) for the denoising of monochromatic images in multiple data availability scenarios, including those with no access to noise-free data. For this purpose, a simple autoencoder architecture was chosen and checked for various training approaches on two large and widely used image datasets: MNIST and CIFAR-10. The results show that the method of training as well as architecture and the similarity of images within the image dataset significantly affect the ML-based denoising. However, even without access to any clear data, the performance of such algorithms is frequently well above the current state-of-the-art; therefore, they should be considered for monochromatic image denoising.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/12/5538image denoisingGaussian noiseautoencoder
spellingShingle Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik
Krzysztof Bernacki
Adam Popowicz
Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
Sensors
image denoising
Gaussian noise
autoencoder
title Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
title_full Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
title_fullStr Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
title_short Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising
title_sort comparison of training strategies for autoencoder based monochromatic image denoising
topic image denoising
Gaussian noise
autoencoder
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/12/5538
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrjozwikwabik comparisonoftrainingstrategiesforautoencoderbasedmonochromaticimagedenoising
AT krzysztofbernacki comparisonoftrainingstrategiesforautoencoderbasedmonochromaticimagedenoising
AT adampopowicz comparisonoftrainingstrategiesforautoencoderbasedmonochromaticimagedenoising