Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model

<p>Cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) is a relatively new radiation management proposal to counteract anthropogenic climate warming by targeting Earth's terrestrial radiation balance. The efficacy of this method was presented in several general circulation model (GCM) studies that showed widely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Tully, D. Neubauer, N. Omanovic, U. Lohmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/11455/2022/acp-22-11455-2022.pdf
_version_ 1828149223816691712
author C. Tully
D. Neubauer
N. Omanovic
U. Lohmann
author_facet C. Tully
D. Neubauer
N. Omanovic
U. Lohmann
author_sort C. Tully
collection DOAJ
description <p>Cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) is a relatively new radiation management proposal to counteract anthropogenic climate warming by targeting Earth's terrestrial radiation balance. The efficacy of this method was presented in several general circulation model (GCM) studies that showed widely varied radiative responses, originating in part from the differences in the representation of cirrus ice microphysics between the different GCMs. The recent implementation of a new, more physically based ice microphysics scheme (Predicted Particle Properties, P3) that abandons ice hydrometeor size class separation into the ECHAM-HAM GCM, coupled to a new approach for calculating cloud fractions that increases the relative humidity (RH) thresholds for cirrus cloud formation, motivated a reassessment of CCT efficacy. In this study, we first compared CCT sensitivity between the new cloud fraction approach and the original ECHAM-HAM cloud fraction approach. Consistent with previous approaches using ECHAM-HAM, with the P3 scheme and the higher RH thresholds for cirrus cloud formation, we do not find a significant cooling response in any of our simulations. The most notable response from our extreme case is the reduction in the maximum global-mean net top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative anomalies from overseeding by about 50 %, from 9.9 W m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> with the original cloud fraction approach down to 4.9 W m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> using the new cloud fraction RH thresholds that allow partial grid-box coverage of cirrus clouds above ice saturation, unlike the original approach. Even with this reduction with the updated cloud fraction approach, the TOA anomalies from overseeding far exceed those reported in previous studies. We attribute the large positive TOA anomalies to seeding particles overtaking both homogeneous nucleation and heterogeneous nucleation on mineral dust particles within cirrus clouds to produce more numerous and smaller ice crystals. This effect is amplified by longer ice residence times in clouds due to the slower removal of ice via sedimentation in the P3 scheme. In an effort to avoid this overtaking effect of seeding particles, we increased the default critical ice saturation ratio (<span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span>) for ice nucleation on seeding particles from the default value of 1.05 to 1.35 in a second sensitivity test. With the higher <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span> we drastically reduce overseeding, which suggests that <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span> is a key factor to consider for future CCT studies. However, the global-mean TOA anomalies contain high uncertainty. In response, we examined the TOA anomalies regionally and found that specific regions only show a small potential for targeted CCT, which is partially enhanced by using the larger <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span>. Finally, in a seasonal analysis of TOA responses to CCT, we find that our results do not confirm the previous finding that high-latitude wintertime seeding is a feasible strategy to enhance CCT efficacy, as seeding in our model enhances the already positive cirrus longwave cloud radiative effect for most of our simulations. Our results also show feedbacks on lower-lying mixed-phase and liquid clouds through the reduction in ice crystal sedimentation that reduces cloud droplet depletion and results in stronger cloud albedo effects. However, this is outweighed by stronger longwave trapping from cirrus clouds with more numerous and smaller ice crystals. Therefore, we conclude that CCT is unlikely to act as a feasible climate intervention strategy on a global scale.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:26:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a879ba4c4d24cb4ae741003ee915cac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:26:53Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-8a879ba4c4d24cb4ae741003ee915cac2022-12-22T04:02:22ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242022-09-0122114551148410.5194/acp-22-11455-2022Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation modelC. TullyD. NeubauerN. OmanovicU. Lohmann<p>Cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) is a relatively new radiation management proposal to counteract anthropogenic climate warming by targeting Earth's terrestrial radiation balance. The efficacy of this method was presented in several general circulation model (GCM) studies that showed widely varied radiative responses, originating in part from the differences in the representation of cirrus ice microphysics between the different GCMs. The recent implementation of a new, more physically based ice microphysics scheme (Predicted Particle Properties, P3) that abandons ice hydrometeor size class separation into the ECHAM-HAM GCM, coupled to a new approach for calculating cloud fractions that increases the relative humidity (RH) thresholds for cirrus cloud formation, motivated a reassessment of CCT efficacy. In this study, we first compared CCT sensitivity between the new cloud fraction approach and the original ECHAM-HAM cloud fraction approach. Consistent with previous approaches using ECHAM-HAM, with the P3 scheme and the higher RH thresholds for cirrus cloud formation, we do not find a significant cooling response in any of our simulations. The most notable response from our extreme case is the reduction in the maximum global-mean net top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative anomalies from overseeding by about 50 %, from 9.9 W m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> with the original cloud fraction approach down to 4.9 W m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> using the new cloud fraction RH thresholds that allow partial grid-box coverage of cirrus clouds above ice saturation, unlike the original approach. Even with this reduction with the updated cloud fraction approach, the TOA anomalies from overseeding far exceed those reported in previous studies. We attribute the large positive TOA anomalies to seeding particles overtaking both homogeneous nucleation and heterogeneous nucleation on mineral dust particles within cirrus clouds to produce more numerous and smaller ice crystals. This effect is amplified by longer ice residence times in clouds due to the slower removal of ice via sedimentation in the P3 scheme. In an effort to avoid this overtaking effect of seeding particles, we increased the default critical ice saturation ratio (<span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span>) for ice nucleation on seeding particles from the default value of 1.05 to 1.35 in a second sensitivity test. With the higher <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span> we drastically reduce overseeding, which suggests that <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span> is a key factor to consider for future CCT studies. However, the global-mean TOA anomalies contain high uncertainty. In response, we examined the TOA anomalies regionally and found that specific regions only show a small potential for targeted CCT, which is partially enhanced by using the larger <span class="inline-formula"><i>S</i><sub>i,seed</sub></span>. Finally, in a seasonal analysis of TOA responses to CCT, we find that our results do not confirm the previous finding that high-latitude wintertime seeding is a feasible strategy to enhance CCT efficacy, as seeding in our model enhances the already positive cirrus longwave cloud radiative effect for most of our simulations. Our results also show feedbacks on lower-lying mixed-phase and liquid clouds through the reduction in ice crystal sedimentation that reduces cloud droplet depletion and results in stronger cloud albedo effects. However, this is outweighed by stronger longwave trapping from cirrus clouds with more numerous and smaller ice crystals. Therefore, we conclude that CCT is unlikely to act as a feasible climate intervention strategy on a global scale.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/11455/2022/acp-22-11455-2022.pdf
spellingShingle C. Tully
D. Neubauer
N. Omanovic
U. Lohmann
Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
title_full Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
title_fullStr Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
title_full_unstemmed Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
title_short Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model
title_sort cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the echam ham general circulation model
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/11455/2022/acp-22-11455-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ctully cirruscloudthinningusingamorephysicallybasedicemicrophysicsschemeintheechamhamgeneralcirculationmodel
AT dneubauer cirruscloudthinningusingamorephysicallybasedicemicrophysicsschemeintheechamhamgeneralcirculationmodel
AT nomanovic cirruscloudthinningusingamorephysicallybasedicemicrophysicsschemeintheechamhamgeneralcirculationmodel
AT ulohmann cirruscloudthinningusingamorephysicallybasedicemicrophysicsschemeintheechamhamgeneralcirculationmodel