Defining Abnormal Fetal Growth and Perinatal Risk: Population or Customized Standards?
In January's Guest Editorial, Sarah Stock and Jenny Myers discuss approaches to fetal and neonatal growth assessment.
Main Authors: | Sarah J Stock, Jenny Myers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002229 |
Similar Items
-
Optimal fetal growth for the Caucasian singleton and assessment of appropriateness of fetal growth: an analysis of a total population perinatal database
by: Lawrence David M, et al.
Published: (2005-05-01) -
PERINATAL RISK FACTORS FOR FETAL AND NEONATAL HYDROCEPHALUS
by: Екатерина Игоревна Мартыненко, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Informativity of perinatal medical card in fetal growth assessment
by: Eugenia Bogonovschi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Maternal risk factors for abnormal placental growth: The national collaborative perinatal project
by: Nicholson Wanda K, et al.
Published: (2008-09-01) -
Adjusting growth standards for fetal sex improves correlation of small babies with stillbirth and adverse perinatal outcomes: A state-wide population study
by: Natasha L. Pritchard, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)