Gut Microbiota Associated with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Carriage in Three Clinical Groups (Inflammatory Bowel Disease, <i>C. difficile</i> Infection and Healthcare Workers) in Hospital Field

<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> is an anaerobic spore-forming Gram-positive bacterium. <i>C. difficile</i> carriage and 16S rDNA profiling were studied in three clinical groups at three different sampling times: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, <i>C. difficile...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Martinez, Sebastien Crevecoeur, Carine Thirion, Jessica Grandjean, Papa Abdoulaye Fall, Marie-Pierre Hayette, Moutschen Michel, Bernard Taminiau, Edouard Louis, Georges Daube
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/10/2527
Description
Summary:<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> is an anaerobic spore-forming Gram-positive bacterium. <i>C. difficile</i> carriage and 16S rDNA profiling were studied in three clinical groups at three different sampling times: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI) patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). Diversity analysis was realized in the three clinical groups, the positive and negative <i>C. difficile</i> carriage groups and the three analysis periods. Concerning the three clinical groups, β-diversity tests showed significant differences between them, especially between the HCW group and IBD group and between IBD patients and CDI patients. The Simpson index (evenness) showed a significant difference between two clinical groups (HCWs and IBD). Several genera were significantly different in the IBD patient group (<i>Sutterella</i>, <i>Agathobacter</i>) and in the CDI patient group (<i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Clostridioides</i>). Concerning the positive and negative <i>C. difficile</i> carriage groups, β-diversity tests showed significant differences. Shannon, Simpson and InvSimpson indexes showed significant differences between the two groups. Several genera had significantly different relative prevalences in the negative group (<i>Agathobacter</i>, <i>Sutterella</i>, <i>Anaerostipes</i>, <i>Oscillospira</i>) and the positive group (<i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>_ge and <i>Enterobacterales</i>_ge). A microbiota footprint was detected in <i>C. difficile</i>-positive carriers. More experiments are needed to test this microbiota footprint to see its impact on <i>C. difficile</i> infection.
ISSN:2076-2607