Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?

There is limited evidence on the relationships of preference for end-of-life life-sustaining treatments [LSTs] and diagnostic contexts like heart failure [HF] or cancer, and patient attitudes toward and perceived susceptibility to use advance directives [ADs]. Thus, this study aimed to compare attit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JinShil Kim, Jiin Choi, Mi-Seung Shin, Miyeong Kim, EunJu Seo, Minjeong An, Jae Lan Shim, Seongkum Heo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238567
_version_ 1819199506068013056
author JinShil Kim
Jiin Choi
Mi-Seung Shin
Miyeong Kim
EunJu Seo
Minjeong An
Jae Lan Shim
Seongkum Heo
author_facet JinShil Kim
Jiin Choi
Mi-Seung Shin
Miyeong Kim
EunJu Seo
Minjeong An
Jae Lan Shim
Seongkum Heo
author_sort JinShil Kim
collection DOAJ
description There is limited evidence on the relationships of preference for end-of-life life-sustaining treatments [LSTs] and diagnostic contexts like heart failure [HF] or cancer, and patient attitudes toward and perceived susceptibility to use advance directives [ADs]. Thus, this study aimed to compare attitudes and perceived susceptibility between HF patients and community-dwelling patients with cancer, and examine the associations of these variables with their preference for each LST (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], ventilation support, hemodialysis, and hospice care). Secondary data were obtained from 36 outpatients with HF (mean age, 65.44 years; male, 69.4%) and 107 cancer patients (mean age, 67.39 years; male, 32.7%). More patients with HF preferred CPR than cancer patients (41.7% and 15.9%, χ2 = 8.88, P = 0.003). Attitudes and perceived susceptibility were similar between the two diagnostic cohorts. HF patients and those with more positive attitudes had greater odds of preferring CPR (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02, confidence interval [CI] = 1.19, 7.70) and hospice care (OR = 1.14, CI = 1.06, 1.23), respectively. HF diagnosis and AD attitudes increased the preference for CPR and hospice care, respectively. This suggests that it is important to gain positive attitudes toward ADs and consider diagnostic context to facilitate informed decision-making for LSTs.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T03:17:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a9459b993d841a2bdc5f1bc0f204077
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T03:17:25Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8a9459b993d841a2bdc5f1bc0f2040772022-12-21T18:02:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023856710.1371/journal.pone.0238567Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?JinShil KimJiin ChoiMi-Seung ShinMiyeong KimEunJu SeoMinjeong AnJae Lan ShimSeongkum HeoThere is limited evidence on the relationships of preference for end-of-life life-sustaining treatments [LSTs] and diagnostic contexts like heart failure [HF] or cancer, and patient attitudes toward and perceived susceptibility to use advance directives [ADs]. Thus, this study aimed to compare attitudes and perceived susceptibility between HF patients and community-dwelling patients with cancer, and examine the associations of these variables with their preference for each LST (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], ventilation support, hemodialysis, and hospice care). Secondary data were obtained from 36 outpatients with HF (mean age, 65.44 years; male, 69.4%) and 107 cancer patients (mean age, 67.39 years; male, 32.7%). More patients with HF preferred CPR than cancer patients (41.7% and 15.9%, χ2 = 8.88, P = 0.003). Attitudes and perceived susceptibility were similar between the two diagnostic cohorts. HF patients and those with more positive attitudes had greater odds of preferring CPR (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02, confidence interval [CI] = 1.19, 7.70) and hospice care (OR = 1.14, CI = 1.06, 1.23), respectively. HF diagnosis and AD attitudes increased the preference for CPR and hospice care, respectively. This suggests that it is important to gain positive attitudes toward ADs and consider diagnostic context to facilitate informed decision-making for LSTs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238567
spellingShingle JinShil Kim
Jiin Choi
Mi-Seung Shin
Miyeong Kim
EunJu Seo
Minjeong An
Jae Lan Shim
Seongkum Heo
Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
PLoS ONE
title Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
title_full Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
title_fullStr Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
title_full_unstemmed Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
title_short Do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end-of-life life-sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ?
title_sort do advance directive attitudes and perceived susceptibility and end of life life sustaining treatment preferences between patients with heart failure and cancer differ
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238567
work_keys_str_mv AT jinshilkim doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT jiinchoi doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT miseungshin doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT miyeongkim doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT eunjuseo doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT minjeongan doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT jaelanshim doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer
AT seongkumheo doadvancedirectiveattitudesandperceivedsusceptibilityandendoflifelifesustainingtreatmentpreferencesbetweenpatientswithheartfailureandcancerdiffer