Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement

Abstract Background Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is an index to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulation and is important to predict the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in patients taking warfarin. In recent years, the portable coagulation monitor, a point-of-care testing device for patients t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yue Shen, Fu-xiu Zhong, Xue-shan Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02046-8
_version_ 1811302312039153664
author Yue Shen
Fu-xiu Zhong
Xue-shan Huang
author_facet Yue Shen
Fu-xiu Zhong
Xue-shan Huang
author_sort Yue Shen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is an index to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulation and is important to predict the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in patients taking warfarin. In recent years, the portable coagulation monitor, a point-of-care testing device for patients to perform self-management international normalized ratio (INR) examination, has provided an opportunity to improve the quality of oral warfarin treatment. In this study, we applied TTR to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the portable coagulation monitor for patients with oral anticoagulant warfarin after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve (MPV) replacement. Methods It is a single-centre cohort study. From September 2019 to June 2021, a total of 243 patients who returned to our institution for outpatient clinic revisit at 3 months after left-sided MPV replacement, met the inclusion criteria and agreed to be followed up were included. Self-management group used portable coagulation monitor for INR examination, and patients in the conventional group had their INR monitored in routine outpatient visits. Clinical data of the patients would be recorded for the next 12 months, and results were compared between the two groups to assess the effect of the coagulation monitor on TTR and complications related to bleeding and thrombosis in patients with left-sided MPV replacement. Results A total of 212 individuals provided complete and validated INR data spanning of 1 year. Those who applied the portable coagulation monitor had higher TTR values and larger number of tests for INR. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic complications, but portable coagulation monitor showed a trend toward fewer bleeding events. Conclusion Portable devices for coagulation monitoring are safe and can achieve a higher TTR. Patients who use the portable coagulation monitor for home INR self-management can achieve a safe and effective warfarin therapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:27:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a9ce15e0ecc47a8a9ff66b2e3b48d86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:27:08Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-8a9ce15e0ecc47a8a9ff66b2e3b48d862022-12-22T02:56:28ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-12-011711610.1186/s13019-022-02046-8Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacementYue Shen0Fu-xiu Zhong1Xue-shan Huang2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityFujian Key Laboratory of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityAbstract Background Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is an index to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulation and is important to predict the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in patients taking warfarin. In recent years, the portable coagulation monitor, a point-of-care testing device for patients to perform self-management international normalized ratio (INR) examination, has provided an opportunity to improve the quality of oral warfarin treatment. In this study, we applied TTR to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the portable coagulation monitor for patients with oral anticoagulant warfarin after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve (MPV) replacement. Methods It is a single-centre cohort study. From September 2019 to June 2021, a total of 243 patients who returned to our institution for outpatient clinic revisit at 3 months after left-sided MPV replacement, met the inclusion criteria and agreed to be followed up were included. Self-management group used portable coagulation monitor for INR examination, and patients in the conventional group had their INR monitored in routine outpatient visits. Clinical data of the patients would be recorded for the next 12 months, and results were compared between the two groups to assess the effect of the coagulation monitor on TTR and complications related to bleeding and thrombosis in patients with left-sided MPV replacement. Results A total of 212 individuals provided complete and validated INR data spanning of 1 year. Those who applied the portable coagulation monitor had higher TTR values and larger number of tests for INR. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic complications, but portable coagulation monitor showed a trend toward fewer bleeding events. Conclusion Portable devices for coagulation monitoring are safe and can achieve a higher TTR. Patients who use the portable coagulation monitor for home INR self-management can achieve a safe and effective warfarin therapy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02046-8Coagulation monitorWarfarin therapyMechanical prosthetic valve
spellingShingle Yue Shen
Fu-xiu Zhong
Xue-shan Huang
Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Coagulation monitor
Warfarin therapy
Mechanical prosthetic valve
title Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
title_full Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
title_short Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
title_sort safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for inr examination after left sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement
topic Coagulation monitor
Warfarin therapy
Mechanical prosthetic valve
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02046-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yueshen safetyandefficacyofusingportablecoagulationmonitorforinrexaminationafterleftsidedmechanicalprostheticvalvereplacement
AT fuxiuzhong safetyandefficacyofusingportablecoagulationmonitorforinrexaminationafterleftsidedmechanicalprostheticvalvereplacement
AT xueshanhuang safetyandefficacyofusingportablecoagulationmonitorforinrexaminationafterleftsidedmechanicalprostheticvalvereplacement