Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations

Motivation: Within the field of bio-implants one topic deals with the in-vitro production of 3D tissues from cell cultures. A major challenge in the cultivation of biopreparations is the imitation of the vascular system with its surrounding tissue. Additiv manufacturing of such vascularisation could...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zöller Nora, Franke Lisa, Claussen Joelle, Gerth Stefan, Rauh Cornelia, Radlanski Ralf J., Hiller Karl-Heinz, Hildenbrand Markus F., Wittenberg Thomas, Hufnagel Eva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2022-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2022-1017
_version_ 1797947900815212544
author Zöller Nora
Franke Lisa
Claussen Joelle
Gerth Stefan
Rauh Cornelia
Radlanski Ralf J.
Hiller Karl-Heinz
Hildenbrand Markus F.
Wittenberg Thomas
Hufnagel Eva
author_facet Zöller Nora
Franke Lisa
Claussen Joelle
Gerth Stefan
Rauh Cornelia
Radlanski Ralf J.
Hiller Karl-Heinz
Hildenbrand Markus F.
Wittenberg Thomas
Hufnagel Eva
author_sort Zöller Nora
collection DOAJ
description Motivation: Within the field of bio-implants one topic deals with the in-vitro production of 3D tissues from cell cultures. A major challenge in the cultivation of biopreparations is the imitation of the vascular system with its surrounding tissue. Additiv manufacturing of such vascularisation could be supported with an adequate template from high-resolution 3D radiographs. Goals: Evaluation of highresolution 3D-imaging methods and 3D-analysis approaches to extract the vascularisation from tissue samples. Methods: To provide such template, vascular structure of small tissues samples (partially treated with contrast medium) were recorded and compared using high-resolution CT and MRI imaging modalities. Optimal measurement parameters were selected for the acquisition of very small vessels. Interactive and semi-automated segmentation of the vessel system were investigated and compared. Results: MRI scans yield a higher contrast than CT scans, but are much slower. Duration of interactive segmentation ranges between 1 to 12 hours. Runtime of the (semi) automatic method was between 5 and 20 minutes, not counting manual adjustment of the parameters. Correlation between manual and automatic segmentation yield Hausdorff distances of 0.024 (CT) and 0.74 (MRI) and Dice coefficients of 0.7 (CT) and 0.39 (MRI). Conclusion: Both imaging methods are appropriate for high-resolution vessel detection and segmentation, nevertheless, MRI with no contrast agent seems preferable if the imaging time can be reduced.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:33:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8aa0b2f9f930472aadb63dcf88419943
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-5504
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:33:50Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-8aa0b2f9f930472aadb63dcf884199432023-01-19T12:47:02ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042022-09-0182616410.1515/cdbme-2022-1017Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparationsZöller Nora0Franke Lisa1Claussen Joelle2Gerth Stefan3Rauh Cornelia4Radlanski Ralf J.5Hiller Karl-Heinz6Hildenbrand Markus F.7Wittenberg Thomas8Hufnagel Eva9Fraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyTU Berlin, Dept. Food Biotechnology and Food Process Engineering,Berlin, GermanyFraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyFraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyTU Berlin, Dept. Food Biotechnology and Food Process Engineering,Berlin, GermanyCharite – Universitatsmedizin,Berlin, GermanyFraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyFraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyFraunhofer IIS and Friedrich-Alexander-UniversitatErlangen-Nurnberg, GermanyFraunhofer IIS, Development Center X-Ray Technology,Furth / Wurzburg, GermanyMotivation: Within the field of bio-implants one topic deals with the in-vitro production of 3D tissues from cell cultures. A major challenge in the cultivation of biopreparations is the imitation of the vascular system with its surrounding tissue. Additiv manufacturing of such vascularisation could be supported with an adequate template from high-resolution 3D radiographs. Goals: Evaluation of highresolution 3D-imaging methods and 3D-analysis approaches to extract the vascularisation from tissue samples. Methods: To provide such template, vascular structure of small tissues samples (partially treated with contrast medium) were recorded and compared using high-resolution CT and MRI imaging modalities. Optimal measurement parameters were selected for the acquisition of very small vessels. Interactive and semi-automated segmentation of the vessel system were investigated and compared. Results: MRI scans yield a higher contrast than CT scans, but are much slower. Duration of interactive segmentation ranges between 1 to 12 hours. Runtime of the (semi) automatic method was between 5 and 20 minutes, not counting manual adjustment of the parameters. Correlation between manual and automatic segmentation yield Hausdorff distances of 0.024 (CT) and 0.74 (MRI) and Dice coefficients of 0.7 (CT) and 0.39 (MRI). Conclusion: Both imaging methods are appropriate for high-resolution vessel detection and segmentation, nevertheless, MRI with no contrast agent seems preferable if the imaging time can be reduced.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2022-1017bio-imagingvascularisationmrict3dreconstruction
spellingShingle Zöller Nora
Franke Lisa
Claussen Joelle
Gerth Stefan
Rauh Cornelia
Radlanski Ralf J.
Hiller Karl-Heinz
Hildenbrand Markus F.
Wittenberg Thomas
Hufnagel Eva
Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
bio-imaging
vascularisation
mri
ct
3dreconstruction
title Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
title_full Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
title_fullStr Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
title_short Evaluation of methods for 3D imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
title_sort evaluation of methods for 3d imaging and analysis of vascularisation in biopreparations
topic bio-imaging
vascularisation
mri
ct
3dreconstruction
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2022-1017
work_keys_str_mv AT zollernora evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT frankelisa evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT claussenjoelle evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT gerthstefan evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT rauhcornelia evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT radlanskiralfj evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT hillerkarlheinz evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT hildenbrandmarkusf evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT wittenbergthomas evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations
AT hufnageleva evaluationofmethodsfor3dimagingandanalysisofvascularisationinbiopreparations