Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives

The IHL targeting rules are framed in relatively abstract terms and there is, unfortunately, no general agreement concerning precisely which objects constitute military objectives and concerning the relative values to be assigned to civilian losses and military advantages when computing the proporti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William J. Fenrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2009-10-01
Series:The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Online Access:https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4535
_version_ 1797727652201627648
author William J. Fenrick
author_facet William J. Fenrick
author_sort William J. Fenrick
collection DOAJ
description The IHL targeting rules are framed in relatively abstract terms and there is, unfortunately, no general agreement concerning precisely which objects constitute military objectives and concerning the relative values to be assigned to civilian losses and military advantages when computing the proportionality equation. The author encourages the development of a dialogue between all informed and interested parties, based in large part on case studies, to clarify the concepts.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:02:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8abe51caeb124279b5fa95411f5f0db2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-5017
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:02:37Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
spelling doaj.art-8abe51caeb124279b5fa95411f5f0db22023-09-02T04:35:58ZengUniversity of WindsorThe Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2561-50172009-10-0127210.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4535Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military ObjectivesWilliam J. Fenrick0Dalhousie University Law School. The author was a military lawyer in the Canadian Forces (1974-94) and a Senior Legal Adviser in the Office of the Prosecutor [OTP] of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia [ICTY] (1994-2004). The views expressed in this article are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of any institution with which the author has been or is affiliated.The IHL targeting rules are framed in relatively abstract terms and there is, unfortunately, no general agreement concerning precisely which objects constitute military objectives and concerning the relative values to be assigned to civilian losses and military advantages when computing the proportionality equation. The author encourages the development of a dialogue between all informed and interested parties, based in large part on case studies, to clarify the concepts.https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4535
spellingShingle William J. Fenrick
Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
title Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
title_full Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
title_fullStr Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
title_full_unstemmed Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
title_short Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives
title_sort applying ihl targeting rules to practical situations proportionality and military objectives
url https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4535
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjfenrick applyingihltargetingrulestopracticalsituationsproportionalityandmilitaryobjectives