An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness

Attractiveness and distinctiveness constitute facial features with high biological and social relevance. Bringing a developmental perspective to research on social-cognitive face perception, we used a large set of faces taken from the FACES Lifespan Database to examine effects of face and perceiver...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie C. Ebner, Joerg Luedicke, Manuel C. Voelkle, Michaela Riediger, Tian Lin, Ulman Lindenberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561/full
_version_ 1818671549416210432
author Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Joerg Luedicke
Manuel C. Voelkle
Manuel C. Voelkle
Michaela Riediger
Michaela Riediger
Tian Lin
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger
author_facet Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Joerg Luedicke
Manuel C. Voelkle
Manuel C. Voelkle
Michaela Riediger
Michaela Riediger
Tian Lin
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger
author_sort Natalie C. Ebner
collection DOAJ
description Attractiveness and distinctiveness constitute facial features with high biological and social relevance. Bringing a developmental perspective to research on social-cognitive face perception, we used a large set of faces taken from the FACES Lifespan Database to examine effects of face and perceiver characteristics on subjective evaluations of attractiveness and distinctiveness in young (20–31 years), middle-aged (44–55 years), and older (70–81 years) men and women. We report novel findings supporting variations by face and perceiver age, in interaction with gender and emotion: although older and middle-aged compared to young perceivers generally rated faces of all ages as more attractive, young perceivers gave relatively higher attractiveness ratings to young compared to middle-aged and older faces. Controlling for variations in attractiveness, older compared to young faces were viewed as more distinctive by young and middle-aged perceivers. Age affected attractiveness more negatively for female than male faces. Furthermore, happy faces were rated as most attractive, while disgusted faces were rated as least attractive, particularly so by middle-aged and older perceivers and for young and female faces. Perceivers largely agreed on distinctiveness ratings for neutral and happy emotions, but older and middle-aged compared to young perceivers rated faces displaying negative emotions as more distinctive. These findings underscore the importance of a lifespan perspective on perception of facial characteristics and suggest possible effects of age on goal-directed perception, social motivation, and in-group bias. This publication makes available picture-specific normative data for experimental stimulus selection.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T07:25:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ac27e6abb484e3597c7950f2cfc8adf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T07:25:46Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-8ac27e6abb484e3597c7950f2cfc8adf2022-12-21T21:58:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-05-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561333220An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and DistinctivenessNatalie C. Ebner0Natalie C. Ebner1Natalie C. Ebner2Joerg Luedicke3Manuel C. Voelkle4Manuel C. Voelkle5Michaela Riediger6Michaela Riediger7Tian Lin8Ulman Lindenberger9Ulman Lindenberger10Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Aging and Geriatric Research, Institute on Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Fiesole, ItalyAttractiveness and distinctiveness constitute facial features with high biological and social relevance. Bringing a developmental perspective to research on social-cognitive face perception, we used a large set of faces taken from the FACES Lifespan Database to examine effects of face and perceiver characteristics on subjective evaluations of attractiveness and distinctiveness in young (20–31 years), middle-aged (44–55 years), and older (70–81 years) men and women. We report novel findings supporting variations by face and perceiver age, in interaction with gender and emotion: although older and middle-aged compared to young perceivers generally rated faces of all ages as more attractive, young perceivers gave relatively higher attractiveness ratings to young compared to middle-aged and older faces. Controlling for variations in attractiveness, older compared to young faces were viewed as more distinctive by young and middle-aged perceivers. Age affected attractiveness more negatively for female than male faces. Furthermore, happy faces were rated as most attractive, while disgusted faces were rated as least attractive, particularly so by middle-aged and older perceivers and for young and female faces. Perceivers largely agreed on distinctiveness ratings for neutral and happy emotions, but older and middle-aged compared to young perceivers rated faces displaying negative emotions as more distinctive. These findings underscore the importance of a lifespan perspective on perception of facial characteristics and suggest possible effects of age on goal-directed perception, social motivation, and in-group bias. This publication makes available picture-specific normative data for experimental stimulus selection.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561/fullageemotionfacesattractivenessdistinctivenesscross-classified random effects analysis
spellingShingle Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Natalie C. Ebner
Joerg Luedicke
Manuel C. Voelkle
Manuel C. Voelkle
Michaela Riediger
Michaela Riediger
Tian Lin
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger
An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
Frontiers in Psychology
age
emotion
faces
attractiveness
distinctiveness
cross-classified random effects analysis
title An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
title_full An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
title_fullStr An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
title_full_unstemmed An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
title_short An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness
title_sort adult developmental approach to perceived facial attractiveness and distinctiveness
topic age
emotion
faces
attractiveness
distinctiveness
cross-classified random effects analysis
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliecebner anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT nataliecebner anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT nataliecebner anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT joergluedicke anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT manuelcvoelkle anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT manuelcvoelkle anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT michaelariediger anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT michaelariediger anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT tianlin anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT ulmanlindenberger anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT ulmanlindenberger anadultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT nataliecebner adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT nataliecebner adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT nataliecebner adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT joergluedicke adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT manuelcvoelkle adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT manuelcvoelkle adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT michaelariediger adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT michaelariediger adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT tianlin adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT ulmanlindenberger adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness
AT ulmanlindenberger adultdevelopmentalapproachtoperceivedfacialattractivenessanddistinctiveness