What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome

BackgroundGlioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Despite multimodal treatment, the median survival time is 15–16 months and 5-year survival rate 5%–10%. The primary goal of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in an unselected populat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Fekete, K. Werlenius, M. Tisell, A. Pivodic, A. Smits, A. S. Jakola, B. Rydenhag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1249366/full
_version_ 1797732600344739840
author B. Fekete
B. Fekete
K. Werlenius
K. Werlenius
M. Tisell
M. Tisell
A. Pivodic
A. Smits
A. Smits
A. S. Jakola
A. S. Jakola
B. Rydenhag
B. Rydenhag
author_facet B. Fekete
B. Fekete
K. Werlenius
K. Werlenius
M. Tisell
M. Tisell
A. Pivodic
A. Smits
A. Smits
A. S. Jakola
A. S. Jakola
B. Rydenhag
B. Rydenhag
author_sort B. Fekete
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundGlioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Despite multimodal treatment, the median survival time is 15–16 months and 5-year survival rate 5%–10%. The primary goal of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in an unselected population of patients operated for glioblastoma. The secondary goal was to explore changes in outcome and the clinical management of this patient group over time.MethodsWe identified 222 consecutive adults operated for glioblastoma between November 2012 and June 2016 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, serving a health care region in the western part of Sweden with 1.900.000 inhabitants. Clinical variables were identified and tested as predictors for prognosis in extended Poisson regression models. The results were compared with a previously published cohort from 2004 to 2008, before current standard of care based on molecular tumor diagnosis was fully implemented.ResultsMedian overall survival was 1.07 years, which was significantly longer than in the 2004–2008 cohort (1.07 vs. 0.73 y, age- and sex adjusted HR = 1.89, p < 0.0001). Variables associated with longer survival in the multivariable model were MGMT promoter hypermethylation, non-central tumor location, complete resection of enhancing tumor, WHO performance status 0–1, unilateral tumor location, fewer lobes involved, younger age and no comorbidities.ConclusionThe median survival for patients with glioblastoma treated according to current standard treatment has moderately but significantly increased, with MGMT promoter hypermethylation as the strongest predictor for survival.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:16:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ac32e58bc6e465d96bcc307ea66d3a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:16:47Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-8ac32e58bc6e465d96bcc307ea66d3a82023-08-30T12:26:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-08-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.12493661249366What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcomeB. Fekete0B. Fekete1K. Werlenius2K. Werlenius3M. Tisell4M. Tisell5A. Pivodic6A. Smits7A. Smits8A. S. Jakola9A. S. Jakola10B. Rydenhag11B. Rydenhag12Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenBackgroundGlioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Despite multimodal treatment, the median survival time is 15–16 months and 5-year survival rate 5%–10%. The primary goal of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in an unselected population of patients operated for glioblastoma. The secondary goal was to explore changes in outcome and the clinical management of this patient group over time.MethodsWe identified 222 consecutive adults operated for glioblastoma between November 2012 and June 2016 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, serving a health care region in the western part of Sweden with 1.900.000 inhabitants. Clinical variables were identified and tested as predictors for prognosis in extended Poisson regression models. The results were compared with a previously published cohort from 2004 to 2008, before current standard of care based on molecular tumor diagnosis was fully implemented.ResultsMedian overall survival was 1.07 years, which was significantly longer than in the 2004–2008 cohort (1.07 vs. 0.73 y, age- and sex adjusted HR = 1.89, p < 0.0001). Variables associated with longer survival in the multivariable model were MGMT promoter hypermethylation, non-central tumor location, complete resection of enhancing tumor, WHO performance status 0–1, unilateral tumor location, fewer lobes involved, younger age and no comorbidities.ConclusionThe median survival for patients with glioblastoma treated according to current standard treatment has moderately but significantly increased, with MGMT promoter hypermethylation as the strongest predictor for survival.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1249366/fullglioblastomapopulation-basedsurvivalprognostic factorstreatment
spellingShingle B. Fekete
B. Fekete
K. Werlenius
K. Werlenius
M. Tisell
M. Tisell
A. Pivodic
A. Smits
A. Smits
A. S. Jakola
A. S. Jakola
B. Rydenhag
B. Rydenhag
What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
Frontiers in Surgery
glioblastoma
population-based
survival
prognostic factors
treatment
title What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
title_full What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
title_fullStr What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
title_full_unstemmed What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
title_short What predicts survival in glioblastoma? A population-based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
title_sort what predicts survival in glioblastoma a population based study of changes in clinical management and outcome
topic glioblastoma
population-based
survival
prognostic factors
treatment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1249366/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bfekete whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT bfekete whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT kwerlenius whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT kwerlenius whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT mtisell whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT mtisell whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT apivodic whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT asmits whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT asmits whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT asjakola whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT asjakola whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT brydenhag whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome
AT brydenhag whatpredictssurvivalinglioblastomaapopulationbasedstudyofchangesinclinicalmanagementandoutcome