The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces

The combined effects of geometrical structure and chemical composition on the diamond surface electronic structures have been investigated in the present study by using high-level theoretical calculations. The effects of diamond surface planes [(111) vs. (100)], surface terminations (H, F, OH, O<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karin Larsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:C
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/2/22
_version_ 1797570626866642944
author Karin Larsson
author_facet Karin Larsson
author_sort Karin Larsson
collection DOAJ
description The combined effects of geometrical structure and chemical composition on the diamond surface electronic structures have been investigated in the present study by using high-level theoretical calculations. The effects of diamond surface planes [(111) vs. (100)], surface terminations (H, F, OH, O<sub>ontop</sub>, O<sub>bridge</sub>, vs. NH<sub>2</sub>), and substitutional doping (B, N vs. P), were of the largest interest to study. As a measure of different electronic structures, the bandgaps, work functions, and electron affinities have been used. In addition to the effects by the doping elements, the different diamond surface planes [(111) vs. (100)] were also observed to cause large differences in the electronic structures. With few exceptions, this was also the case for the surface termination species. For example, O<sub>ontop</sub>-termination was found to induce surface electron conductivities for all systems in the present study (except for a non-doped (100) surface). The other types of surface terminating species induced a reduction in bandgap values. The calculated bandgap ranges for the (111) surface were 3.4–5.7 (non-doping), and 0.9–5.3 (B-doping). For the (100) surface, the ranges were 0.9–5.3 (undoping) and 3.2–4.3 (B-doping). For almost all systems in the present investigation, it was found that photo-induced electron emission cannot take place. The only exception is the non-doped NH<sub>2</sub>-terminated diamond (111) surface, for which a direct photo-induced electron emission is possible.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:28:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ac6fa456742462c8342d01b7697bd45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-5629
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:28:16Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series C
spelling doaj.art-8ac6fa456742462c8342d01b7697bd452023-11-19T21:37:43ZengMDPI AGC2311-56292020-04-01622210.3390/c6020022The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond SurfacesKarin Larsson0Department of Chemistry-Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, 75121 Uppsala, SwedenThe combined effects of geometrical structure and chemical composition on the diamond surface electronic structures have been investigated in the present study by using high-level theoretical calculations. The effects of diamond surface planes [(111) vs. (100)], surface terminations (H, F, OH, O<sub>ontop</sub>, O<sub>bridge</sub>, vs. NH<sub>2</sub>), and substitutional doping (B, N vs. P), were of the largest interest to study. As a measure of different electronic structures, the bandgaps, work functions, and electron affinities have been used. In addition to the effects by the doping elements, the different diamond surface planes [(111) vs. (100)] were also observed to cause large differences in the electronic structures. With few exceptions, this was also the case for the surface termination species. For example, O<sub>ontop</sub>-termination was found to induce surface electron conductivities for all systems in the present study (except for a non-doped (100) surface). The other types of surface terminating species induced a reduction in bandgap values. The calculated bandgap ranges for the (111) surface were 3.4–5.7 (non-doping), and 0.9–5.3 (B-doping). For the (100) surface, the ranges were 0.9–5.3 (undoping) and 3.2–4.3 (B-doping). For almost all systems in the present investigation, it was found that photo-induced electron emission cannot take place. The only exception is the non-doped NH<sub>2</sub>-terminated diamond (111) surface, for which a direct photo-induced electron emission is possible.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/2/22diamonddopingsurface terminationelectronic structureband gapwork function
spellingShingle Karin Larsson
The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
C
diamond
doping
surface termination
electronic structure
band gap
work function
title The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
title_full The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
title_fullStr The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
title_short The Combined Influence of Dopant Species and Surface Termination on the Electronic Properties of Diamond Surfaces
title_sort combined influence of dopant species and surface termination on the electronic properties of diamond surfaces
topic diamond
doping
surface termination
electronic structure
band gap
work function
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/2/22
work_keys_str_mv AT karinlarsson thecombinedinfluenceofdopantspeciesandsurfaceterminationontheelectronicpropertiesofdiamondsurfaces
AT karinlarsson combinedinfluenceofdopantspeciesandsurfaceterminationontheelectronicpropertiesofdiamondsurfaces