Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin
Introduction. Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is of great importance. In this way, we aimed to evaluate the performance of three well known scoring systems of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) and Full Rockall Score (FRS) in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with UGIB...
Main Authors: | Shafaghi Afshin, Gharibpoor Faeze, Mahdipour Zahra, Samadani Ali Akbar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2019-0016 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford, and pre-endoscopy Rockall scoring systems for risk stratification in Egyptian patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
by: Tarek A Fouad, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
by: Arunchai Chang, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China
by: Lei Gu, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Antoine Boustany, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
by: Mokhtare M, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)