Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View

Due to a variety of natural causes, suffering predominates over well-being in the lives of wild animals. From an antispeciesist standpoint that considers the interests of all sentient individuals, we should intervene in nature to benefit these animals, provided that the expectable result is net posi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eze Paez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LED Edizioni Universitarie 2015-11-01
Series:Relations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/882
_version_ 1811276710364053504
author Eze Paez
author_facet Eze Paez
author_sort Eze Paez
collection DOAJ
description Due to a variety of natural causes, suffering predominates over well-being in the lives of wild animals. From an antispeciesist standpoint that considers the interests of all sentient individuals, we should intervene in nature to benefit these animals, provided that the expectable result is net positive. However, according to the environmentalist view the aim of benefiting wild animals cannot justify intervening in nature. In addition, harmful human interventions can sometimes be justified. This view assumes that (i) certain entities such as ecosystems or species have intrinsic value, and that (ii) at least sometimes these values are more important than nonhuman well-being. In this article I review the arguments in support of this view advanced by three prominent environmentalists (Albert Schweitzer, Paul W. Taylor and J. Baird Callicott) and show how none of them succeed at grounding these assumptions.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:02:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8adc3565ce4d4bd68a42bd6d458251e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2283-3196
2280-9643
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:02:32Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher LED Edizioni Universitarie
record_format Article
series Relations
spelling doaj.art-8adc3565ce4d4bd68a42bd6d458251e82022-12-22T03:11:19ZengLED Edizioni UniversitarieRelations2283-31962280-96432015-11-013216517810.7358/rela-2015-002-paez701Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist ViewEze PaezDue to a variety of natural causes, suffering predominates over well-being in the lives of wild animals. From an antispeciesist standpoint that considers the interests of all sentient individuals, we should intervene in nature to benefit these animals, provided that the expectable result is net positive. However, according to the environmentalist view the aim of benefiting wild animals cannot justify intervening in nature. In addition, harmful human interventions can sometimes be justified. This view assumes that (i) certain entities such as ecosystems or species have intrinsic value, and that (ii) at least sometimes these values are more important than nonhuman well-being. In this article I review the arguments in support of this view advanced by three prominent environmentalists (Albert Schweitzer, Paul W. Taylor and J. Baird Callicott) and show how none of them succeed at grounding these assumptions.http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/882animal ethicsantispeciesismenvironmentalismbiocentrismecocentrismnonhuman animalsintrinsic valueintervention in naturewild animalsnatural harms
spellingShingle Eze Paez
Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
Relations
animal ethics
antispeciesism
environmentalism
biocentrism
ecocentrism
nonhuman animals
intrinsic value
intervention in nature
wild animals
natural harms
title Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
title_full Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
title_fullStr Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
title_full_unstemmed Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
title_short Refusing Help and Inflicting Harm. A Critique of the Environmentalist View
title_sort refusing help and inflicting harm a critique of the environmentalist view
topic animal ethics
antispeciesism
environmentalism
biocentrism
ecocentrism
nonhuman animals
intrinsic value
intervention in nature
wild animals
natural harms
url http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/882
work_keys_str_mv AT ezepaez refusinghelpandinflictingharmacritiqueoftheenvironmentalistview