Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?

Are some cognitive functions properly humans? In this article I argue that if we combine our best theories in ethology and in neuroscience, we can see that non-human animals have mental representations, exhibit intentionality and can plan an action with intermediary steps. Besides, even though neith...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mouhamadou El Hady Ba
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Pléiade (EA 7338) 2020-12-01
Series:Itinéraires
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8302
_version_ 1819296427824644096
author Mouhamadou El Hady Ba
author_facet Mouhamadou El Hady Ba
author_sort Mouhamadou El Hady Ba
collection DOAJ
description Are some cognitive functions properly humans? In this article I argue that if we combine our best theories in ethology and in neuroscience, we can see that non-human animals have mental representations, exhibit intentionality and can plan an action with intermediary steps. Besides, even though neither scientists nor philosophers can say they have rigorously defined consciousness, our best theories can’t rule out its presence in non-human animals. We thus conclude that the difference between human and non-human cognition is, at best, a difference of degree rather than of nature
first_indexed 2024-12-24T04:57:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ade2454b6fc419d978997fffdf6e465
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2427-920X
language fra
last_indexed 2024-12-24T04:57:57Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Pléiade (EA 7338)
record_format Article
series Itinéraires
spelling doaj.art-8ade2454b6fc419d978997fffdf6e4652022-12-21T17:14:20ZfraPléiade (EA 7338)Itinéraires2427-920X2020-12-012020210.4000/itineraires.8302Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?Mouhamadou El Hady BaAre some cognitive functions properly humans? In this article I argue that if we combine our best theories in ethology and in neuroscience, we can see that non-human animals have mental representations, exhibit intentionality and can plan an action with intermediary steps. Besides, even though neither scientists nor philosophers can say they have rigorously defined consciousness, our best theories can’t rule out its presence in non-human animals. We thus conclude that the difference between human and non-human cognition is, at best, a difference of degree rather than of naturehttp://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8302consciousnessintentionalitymental representationanimal cognitionanthropodenial(anti-)speciesism
spellingShingle Mouhamadou El Hady Ba
Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
Itinéraires
consciousness
intentionality
mental representation
animal cognition
anthropodenial
(anti-)speciesism
title Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
title_full Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
title_fullStr Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
title_full_unstemmed Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
title_short Sapiens Animalis. La pensée spécifie-t-elle l’humain ?
title_sort sapiens animalis la pensee specifie t elle l humain
topic consciousness
intentionality
mental representation
animal cognition
anthropodenial
(anti-)speciesism
url http://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8302
work_keys_str_mv AT mouhamadouelhadyba sapiensanimalislapenseespecifietellelhumain