A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures

Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Golabchi, Andrew Chao, Mahdi Tavakoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/7/2714
_version_ 1797437651344687104
author Ali Golabchi
Andrew Chao
Mahdi Tavakoli
author_facet Ali Golabchi
Andrew Chao
Mahdi Tavakoli
author_sort Ali Golabchi
collection DOAJ
description Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:25:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ade733cc7f04e2ab3f71845cb44598d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:25:25Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-8ade733cc7f04e2ab3f71845cb44598d2023-12-01T00:04:05ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-04-01227271410.3390/s22072714A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body PosturesAli Golabchi0Andrew Chao1Mahdi Tavakoli2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, CanadaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, CanadaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, CanadaIndustrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/7/2714exoskeletonsexosuitswearable robotswearable technologiesindustrial exoskeletonsmusculoskeletal disorders
spellingShingle Ali Golabchi
Andrew Chao
Mahdi Tavakoli
A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
Sensors
exoskeletons
exosuits
wearable robots
wearable technologies
industrial exoskeletons
musculoskeletal disorders
title A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_full A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_short A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_sort systematic review of industrial exoskeletons for injury prevention efficacy evaluation metrics target tasks and supported body postures
topic exoskeletons
exosuits
wearable robots
wearable technologies
industrial exoskeletons
musculoskeletal disorders
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/7/2714
work_keys_str_mv AT aligolabchi asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT andrewchao asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT mahditavakoli asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT aligolabchi systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT andrewchao systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT mahditavakoli systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures