Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation.
The achievement of a robust, effective and responsible form of data sharing is currently regarded as a priority for biological and bio-medical research. Empirical evaluations of data sharing may be regarded as an indispensable first step in the identification of critical aspects and the development...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22679483/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1818700868348805120 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicola Milia Alessandra Congiu Paolo Anagnostou Francesco Montinaro Marco Capocasa Emanuele Sanna Giovanni Destro Bisol |
| author_facet | Nicola Milia Alessandra Congiu Paolo Anagnostou Francesco Montinaro Marco Capocasa Emanuele Sanna Giovanni Destro Bisol |
| author_sort | Nicola Milia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The achievement of a robust, effective and responsible form of data sharing is currently regarded as a priority for biological and bio-medical research. Empirical evaluations of data sharing may be regarded as an indispensable first step in the identification of critical aspects and the development of strategies aimed at increasing availability of research data for the scientific community as a whole. Research concerning human genetic variation represents a potential forerunner in the establishment of widespread sharing of primary datasets. However, no specific analysis has been conducted to date in order to ascertain whether the sharing of primary datasets is common-practice in this research field. To this aim, we analyzed a total of 543 mitochondrial and Y chromosomal datasets reported in 508 papers indexed in the Pubmed database from 2008 to 2011. A substantial portion of datasets (21.9%) was found to have been withheld, while neither strong editorial policies nor high impact factor proved to be effective in increasing the sharing rate beyond the current figure of 80.5%. Disaggregating datasets for research fields, we could observe a substantially lower sharing in medical than evolutionary and forensic genetics, more evident for whole mtDNA sequences (15.0% vs 99.6%). The low rate of positive responses to e-mail requests sent to corresponding authors of withheld datasets (28.6%) suggests that sharing should be regarded as a prerequisite for final paper acceptance, while making authors deposit their results in open online databases which provide data quality control seems to provide the best-practice standard. Finally, we estimated that 29.8% to 32.9% of total resources are used to generate withheld datasets, implying that an important portion of research funding does not produce shared knowledge. By making the scientific community and the public aware of this important aspect, we may help popularize a more effective culture of data sharing. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T15:11:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8ae85a4134eb4e3b8914db7bf68cad3b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T15:11:47Z |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-8ae85a4134eb4e3b8914db7bf68cad3b2022-12-21T21:43:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3755210.1371/journal.pone.0037552Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation.Nicola MiliaAlessandra CongiuPaolo AnagnostouFrancesco MontinaroMarco CapocasaEmanuele SannaGiovanni Destro BisolThe achievement of a robust, effective and responsible form of data sharing is currently regarded as a priority for biological and bio-medical research. Empirical evaluations of data sharing may be regarded as an indispensable first step in the identification of critical aspects and the development of strategies aimed at increasing availability of research data for the scientific community as a whole. Research concerning human genetic variation represents a potential forerunner in the establishment of widespread sharing of primary datasets. However, no specific analysis has been conducted to date in order to ascertain whether the sharing of primary datasets is common-practice in this research field. To this aim, we analyzed a total of 543 mitochondrial and Y chromosomal datasets reported in 508 papers indexed in the Pubmed database from 2008 to 2011. A substantial portion of datasets (21.9%) was found to have been withheld, while neither strong editorial policies nor high impact factor proved to be effective in increasing the sharing rate beyond the current figure of 80.5%. Disaggregating datasets for research fields, we could observe a substantially lower sharing in medical than evolutionary and forensic genetics, more evident for whole mtDNA sequences (15.0% vs 99.6%). The low rate of positive responses to e-mail requests sent to corresponding authors of withheld datasets (28.6%) suggests that sharing should be regarded as a prerequisite for final paper acceptance, while making authors deposit their results in open online databases which provide data quality control seems to provide the best-practice standard. Finally, we estimated that 29.8% to 32.9% of total resources are used to generate withheld datasets, implying that an important portion of research funding does not produce shared knowledge. By making the scientific community and the public aware of this important aspect, we may help popularize a more effective culture of data sharing.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22679483/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Nicola Milia Alessandra Congiu Paolo Anagnostou Francesco Montinaro Marco Capocasa Emanuele Sanna Giovanni Destro Bisol Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. |
| title_full | Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. |
| title_fullStr | Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. |
| title_short | Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. |
| title_sort | mine yours ours sharing data on human genetic variation |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22679483/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolamilia mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT alessandracongiu mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT paoloanagnostou mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT francescomontinaro mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT marcocapocasa mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT emanuelesanna mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation AT giovannidestrobisol mineyoursourssharingdataonhumangeneticvariation |