Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging

Abstract Background Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su-Ho Lim, Seongyong Jeong, Jang Hwan Ahn, Jano van Hemert, Min Sagong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-y
_version_ 1818565811686604800
author Su-Ho Lim
Seongyong Jeong
Jang Hwan Ahn
Jano van Hemert
Min Sagong
author_facet Su-Ho Lim
Seongyong Jeong
Jang Hwan Ahn
Jano van Hemert
Min Sagong
author_sort Su-Ho Lim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensional fundus image was mapped to a two-dimensional stereographic plane by projecting all relevant pixels onto a plane through the equator of the eye. However, even with this impressive algorithm, refractive error itself might affect the size and quality of images theoretically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of refractive power on retinal area measurements (quantification) using UWF retinal imaging (Optos California; Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). Methods A prospective, interventional study comprised 50 healthy eyes. UWF images were acquired first without the use of a soft contact lens (CL) and then repeated with six CLs (+ 9D, +6D, +3D, -3D, -6D, and − 9D). Using stereographically projected UWF images, the optic disc was outlined by 15–17 points and quantified in metric units. We divided the subjects into three groups according to axial length: Groups A (22–24 mm), B (24–26 mm), and C (≥ 26 mm). The primary outcome was percentage change before and after use of the CLs. Secondary outcome was proportion of subjects with magnification effects, maximal changes > 10 %. Results The study population was 6, 28, and 16 eyes in each group. Overall changes for the measured area were not significantly different in the whole study population. Group C had a larger proportion of magnification effects compared to Groups A and B (50.0 %, 0 %, and 3.6 %, P = 0.020). Measured area with plus lenses was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001). Conclusions The use of CLs might affect quantification of eyes with long axial length when using UWF images. Ophthalmologists should consider refractive error when measuring area in long eyes.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:45:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8aeefd7689a04b0a8eb193c330df5df7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:45:43Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-8aeefd7689a04b0a8eb193c330df5df72022-12-21T23:21:35ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152021-03-012111810.1186/s12886-021-01900-yEffects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imagingSu-Ho Lim0Seongyong Jeong1Jang Hwan Ahn2Jano van Hemert3Min Sagong4Department of Ophthalmology, Daegu Veterans Health Service Medical CenterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of MedicineOptos plcDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of MedicineAbstract Background Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensional fundus image was mapped to a two-dimensional stereographic plane by projecting all relevant pixels onto a plane through the equator of the eye. However, even with this impressive algorithm, refractive error itself might affect the size and quality of images theoretically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of refractive power on retinal area measurements (quantification) using UWF retinal imaging (Optos California; Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). Methods A prospective, interventional study comprised 50 healthy eyes. UWF images were acquired first without the use of a soft contact lens (CL) and then repeated with six CLs (+ 9D, +6D, +3D, -3D, -6D, and − 9D). Using stereographically projected UWF images, the optic disc was outlined by 15–17 points and quantified in metric units. We divided the subjects into three groups according to axial length: Groups A (22–24 mm), B (24–26 mm), and C (≥ 26 mm). The primary outcome was percentage change before and after use of the CLs. Secondary outcome was proportion of subjects with magnification effects, maximal changes > 10 %. Results The study population was 6, 28, and 16 eyes in each group. Overall changes for the measured area were not significantly different in the whole study population. Group C had a larger proportion of magnification effects compared to Groups A and B (50.0 %, 0 %, and 3.6 %, P = 0.020). Measured area with plus lenses was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001). Conclusions The use of CLs might affect quantification of eyes with long axial length when using UWF images. Ophthalmologists should consider refractive error when measuring area in long eyes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-yArea measurementAxial lengthRetinaUltra‐widefield imagingQuantification
spellingShingle Su-Ho Lim
Seongyong Jeong
Jang Hwan Ahn
Jano van Hemert
Min Sagong
Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
BMC Ophthalmology
Area measurement
Axial length
Retina
Ultra‐widefield imaging
Quantification
title Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_full Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_fullStr Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_short Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_sort effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra widefield retinal imaging
topic Area measurement
Axial length
Retina
Ultra‐widefield imaging
Quantification
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-y
work_keys_str_mv AT suholim effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT seongyongjeong effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT janghwanahn effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT janovanhemert effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT minsagong effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging