Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol

OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. DESIGN:. We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protoc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob A. Braaten, BA, Bridget S. Dillon, BS, Jillian K. Wothe, BS, Conner P. Olson, BS, MPH, Elizabeth R. Lusczek, PhD, Kristiana J. Sather, MD, Gregory J. Beilman, MD, Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-12-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001020
_version_ 1797375052000264192
author Jacob A. Braaten, BA
Bridget S. Dillon, BS
Jillian K. Wothe, BS
Conner P. Olson, BS, MPH
Elizabeth R. Lusczek, PhD
Kristiana J. Sather, MD
Gregory J. Beilman, MD
Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD
author_facet Jacob A. Braaten, BA
Bridget S. Dillon, BS
Jillian K. Wothe, BS
Conner P. Olson, BS, MPH
Elizabeth R. Lusczek, PhD
Kristiana J. Sather, MD
Gregory J. Beilman, MD
Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD
author_sort Jacob A. Braaten, BA
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. DESIGN:. We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protocol, implemented in March 2020, was defined as transfusion of blood products for a hemoglobin level less than 7, platelet levels less than 50, and/or fibrinogen levels less than 100. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mode of ECMO received: venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and ECMO support following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). SETTING:. M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center. PATIENTS:. The study included 507 patients. INTERVENTIONS:. One hundred fifty-one patients (29.9%) were placed on venoarterial ECMO, 70 (13.8%) on venovenous ECMO, and 286 (56.4%) on ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. For patients on venoarterial ECMO (48 [71.6%] vs. 52 [63.4%]; p = 0.374), venovenous ECMO (23 [63.9%] vs. 15 [45.5%]; p = 0.195), and ECPR (54 [50.0%] vs. 69 [39.2%]; p = 0.097), there were no significant differences in survival on ECMO. The last recorded mean hemoglobin value was also significantly decreased for venoarterial ECMO (8.10 [7.80–8.50] vs. 7.50 [7.15–8.25]; p = 0.001) and ECPR (8.20 [7.90–8.60] vs. 7.55 [7.10–8.88]; p < 0.001) following implementation of the restrictive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSIONS:. These data suggest that a restrictive transfusion protocol is noninferior to ECMO patient survival. Additional, prospective randomized trials are required for further investigation of the safety of a restrictive transfusion protocol.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8af284c4dff2411ab4e8b3c72e2cfcff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-8028
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:39Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Critical Care Explorations
spelling doaj.art-8af284c4dff2411ab4e8b3c72e2cfcff2023-12-27T06:49:37ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282023-12-01512e102010.1097/CCE.0000000000001020202312000-00011Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion ProtocolJacob A. Braaten, BA0Bridget S. Dillon, BS1Jillian K. Wothe, BS2Conner P. Olson, BS, MPH3Elizabeth R. Lusczek, PhD4Kristiana J. Sather, MD5Gregory J. Beilman, MD6Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD71 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.1 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.1 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.1 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.2 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.2 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.2 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.2 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. DESIGN:. We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protocol, implemented in March 2020, was defined as transfusion of blood products for a hemoglobin level less than 7, platelet levels less than 50, and/or fibrinogen levels less than 100. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mode of ECMO received: venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and ECMO support following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). SETTING:. M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center. PATIENTS:. The study included 507 patients. INTERVENTIONS:. One hundred fifty-one patients (29.9%) were placed on venoarterial ECMO, 70 (13.8%) on venovenous ECMO, and 286 (56.4%) on ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. For patients on venoarterial ECMO (48 [71.6%] vs. 52 [63.4%]; p = 0.374), venovenous ECMO (23 [63.9%] vs. 15 [45.5%]; p = 0.195), and ECPR (54 [50.0%] vs. 69 [39.2%]; p = 0.097), there were no significant differences in survival on ECMO. The last recorded mean hemoglobin value was also significantly decreased for venoarterial ECMO (8.10 [7.80–8.50] vs. 7.50 [7.15–8.25]; p = 0.001) and ECPR (8.20 [7.90–8.60] vs. 7.55 [7.10–8.88]; p < 0.001) following implementation of the restrictive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSIONS:. These data suggest that a restrictive transfusion protocol is noninferior to ECMO patient survival. Additional, prospective randomized trials are required for further investigation of the safety of a restrictive transfusion protocol.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001020
spellingShingle Jacob A. Braaten, BA
Bridget S. Dillon, BS
Jillian K. Wothe, BS
Conner P. Olson, BS, MPH
Elizabeth R. Lusczek, PhD
Kristiana J. Sather, MD
Gregory J. Beilman, MD
Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
Critical Care Explorations
title Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
title_full Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
title_fullStr Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
title_short Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol
title_sort extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patient outcomes following restrictive blood transfusion protocol
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001020
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobabraatenba extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT bridgetsdillonbs extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT jilliankwothebs extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT connerpolsonbsmph extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT elizabethrlusczekphd extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT kristianajsathermd extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT gregoryjbeilmanmd extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol
AT melissaebrunsvoldmd extracorporealmembraneoxygenationpatientoutcomesfollowingrestrictivebloodtransfusionprotocol