The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine

Greater levels of complexity in tunnelling with Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) allow higher chances of failures that may increase the potential hazardous risks. This paper presents the results of a study on TBM reliability using risk analysis. Machinery Failure Mode and Effect analysis was applied to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Javad Jafari, Nor-alddin Gharari, Hamid Reza Sheikhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-07-01
Series:International Journal of Occupational Hygiene
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/4
_version_ 1818370212891721728
author Mohammad Javad Jafari
Nor-alddin Gharari
Hamid Reza Sheikhi
author_facet Mohammad Javad Jafari
Nor-alddin Gharari
Hamid Reza Sheikhi
author_sort Mohammad Javad Jafari
collection DOAJ
description Greater levels of complexity in tunnelling with Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) allow higher chances of failures that may increase the potential hazardous risks. This paper presents the results of a study on TBM reliability using risk analysis. Machinery Failure Mode and Effect analysis was applied to analyze the risks of a TBM using QS9000 and SAE.J1739 recommendations. For this purpose, 48 failure modes were postulated for the TBM main systems and all subsystems. Afterwards, the effects of every failure were listed. Safeguards or controls that might prevent or mitigate the effects of each failure were also listed. In the final step, essential remedial actions to prevent or mitigate the failure were recommended. Risk Matrix was developed for each possible failure to be used for risk ranking. For this, the Risk Priority Number (RPN) was estimated for each failure mode for pro and post application of control measures to identify the most critical failures. The results revealed that 7 failure modes had risk priority numbers higher than 80 therefore, they were categorized unacceptable. Cutter head stop due to bad rock condition with RPN=240 was the significant critical failure. The results also showed that 3 failure modes in TBM required modification due to high Severity rate. The findings from this study were applied to a long tunnel under construction and significantly reduced the accidents during the next two years tunnelling period. It can be concluded that MFMEA is a superb tool for TBM reliability evaluation and promotion.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T23:36:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8af2d7d23ce14163ba0aa90055d1604e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-5109
2008-5435
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T23:36:09Z
publishDate 2009-07-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Occupational Hygiene
spelling doaj.art-8af2d7d23ce14163ba0aa90055d1604e2022-12-21T23:27:18ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Occupational Hygiene2008-51092008-54352009-07-0111The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring MachineMohammad Javad Jafari0Nor-alddin Gharari1Hamid Reza Sheikhi2Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, University of Shahid Beheshti (MC), Tehran, IrDepartment of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, University of Shahid Beheshti (MC), Tehran, IrDepartment of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, University of Shahid Beheshti (MC), Tehran, IrGreater levels of complexity in tunnelling with Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) allow higher chances of failures that may increase the potential hazardous risks. This paper presents the results of a study on TBM reliability using risk analysis. Machinery Failure Mode and Effect analysis was applied to analyze the risks of a TBM using QS9000 and SAE.J1739 recommendations. For this purpose, 48 failure modes were postulated for the TBM main systems and all subsystems. Afterwards, the effects of every failure were listed. Safeguards or controls that might prevent or mitigate the effects of each failure were also listed. In the final step, essential remedial actions to prevent or mitigate the failure were recommended. Risk Matrix was developed for each possible failure to be used for risk ranking. For this, the Risk Priority Number (RPN) was estimated for each failure mode for pro and post application of control measures to identify the most critical failures. The results revealed that 7 failure modes had risk priority numbers higher than 80 therefore, they were categorized unacceptable. Cutter head stop due to bad rock condition with RPN=240 was the significant critical failure. The results also showed that 3 failure modes in TBM required modification due to high Severity rate. The findings from this study were applied to a long tunnel under construction and significantly reduced the accidents during the next two years tunnelling period. It can be concluded that MFMEA is a superb tool for TBM reliability evaluation and promotion.https://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/4RiskTunnellingAnalysisHazardTunnel Boring Machine
spellingShingle Mohammad Javad Jafari
Nor-alddin Gharari
Hamid Reza Sheikhi
The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
International Journal of Occupational Hygiene
Risk
Tunnelling
Analysis
Hazard
Tunnel Boring Machine
title The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
title_full The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
title_fullStr The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
title_short The Reliability of a Tunnel Boring Machine
title_sort reliability of a tunnel boring machine
topic Risk
Tunnelling
Analysis
Hazard
Tunnel Boring Machine
url https://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/4
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadjavadjafari thereliabilityofatunnelboringmachine
AT noralddingharari thereliabilityofatunnelboringmachine
AT hamidrezasheikhi thereliabilityofatunnelboringmachine
AT mohammadjavadjafari reliabilityofatunnelboringmachine
AT noralddingharari reliabilityofatunnelboringmachine
AT hamidrezasheikhi reliabilityofatunnelboringmachine