Are People-Centered Intelligences Psychometrically Distinct from Thing-Centered Intelligences? A Meta-Analysis

The Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) or three-stratum model of intelligence envisions human intelligence as a hierarchy. General intelligence (<i>g</i>) is situated at the top, under which are a group of broad intelligences such as verbal, visuospatial processing, and quantitative knowledge th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria M. Bryan, John D. Mayer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/4/48
Description
Summary:The Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) or three-stratum model of intelligence envisions human intelligence as a hierarchy. General intelligence (<i>g</i>) is situated at the top, under which are a group of broad intelligences such as verbal, visuospatial processing, and quantitative knowledge that pertain to more specific areas of reasoning. Some broad intelligences are people-centered, including personal, emotional, and social intelligences; others concern reasoning about things more generally, such as visuospatial and quantitative knowledge. In the present research, we conducted a meta-analysis of 87 studies, including 2322 effect sizes, to examine the average correlation between people-to-people intelligences relative to the average correlation between people-to-thing-centered intelligences (and similar comparisons). Results clearly support the psychometric distinction between people-centered and thing-centered mental abilities. Coupled with evidence for incremental predictions from people-centered intelligences, our findings provide a secure foundation for continued research focused on people-centered mental abilities.
ISSN:2079-3200