Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation
This paper combines methods of argumentation theory and artificial intelligence to extend existing work on the dialectical structure of crossexamination. The existing method used conflict diagrams to search for inconsistent statements in the testimony of a witness. This paper extends the method by u...
Main Author: | Walton Douglas |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0030 |
Similar Items
-
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks
by: Erik C. W. Krabbe, et al.
Published: (1993-01-01) -
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication
by: Martini Carlo
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments
by: Patrick Bondy
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments
by: Patrick Bondy
Published: (2015-12-01)