Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the ocular biometric parameters between intraocular lens (IOL) master and applanation A-scan in eyes with different axial lengths (ALs). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted 211 patients scheduled for cataract surgery at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rimple Gopi, Sanitha Sathyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=35;epage=40;aulast=Gopi
_version_ 1818312506824720384
author Rimple Gopi
Sanitha Sathyan
author_facet Rimple Gopi
Sanitha Sathyan
author_sort Rimple Gopi
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the ocular biometric parameters between intraocular lens (IOL) master and applanation A-scan in eyes with different axial lengths (ALs). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted 211 patients scheduled for cataract surgery at a tertiary care eye hospital. AL and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were obtained both by IOL master and applanation A-scan under standard operating conditions and analyzed. Results: The study sample comprised 211 eyes of 211 patients. Mean age of patients was 60.04 ± 7.90 years (range 40–84 years), 81% were male and 19% were female. Eyes were divided into four groups depending on their AL measurements as extremely long> 27.0 mm, long 25.0–27.0 mm, medium 22.0–25.0 mm, short <22.0 mm. The ALs measured by IOL master was significantly higher than those measured by A-scan (P < 0.001). Mean ACD with both methods was 3.23 ± 0.45 and 3.20 ± 0.46, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, there was good agreement between AL and ACD between IOL master and ultrasound A-scan in extremely long, long, medium, and short eyes. Conclusion: AL and ACD showed good agreement between IOL master and applanation A-scan measurements at all range of ALs.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:18:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b0da566f05d456c94b6bb9a34553783
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:18:56Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-8b0da566f05d456c94b6bb9a345537832022-12-21T23:54:03ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsKerala Journal of Ophthalmology0976-66772017-01-01291354010.4103/kjo.kjo_43_17Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengthsRimple GopiSanitha SathyanAim: The aim of this study is to compare the ocular biometric parameters between intraocular lens (IOL) master and applanation A-scan in eyes with different axial lengths (ALs). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted 211 patients scheduled for cataract surgery at a tertiary care eye hospital. AL and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were obtained both by IOL master and applanation A-scan under standard operating conditions and analyzed. Results: The study sample comprised 211 eyes of 211 patients. Mean age of patients was 60.04 ± 7.90 years (range 40–84 years), 81% were male and 19% were female. Eyes were divided into four groups depending on their AL measurements as extremely long> 27.0 mm, long 25.0–27.0 mm, medium 22.0–25.0 mm, short <22.0 mm. The ALs measured by IOL master was significantly higher than those measured by A-scan (P < 0.001). Mean ACD with both methods was 3.23 ± 0.45 and 3.20 ± 0.46, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, there was good agreement between AL and ACD between IOL master and ultrasound A-scan in extremely long, long, medium, and short eyes. Conclusion: AL and ACD showed good agreement between IOL master and applanation A-scan measurements at all range of ALs.http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=35;epage=40;aulast=GopiApplanation A scanIOL masterocular biometry
spellingShingle Rimple Gopi
Sanitha Sathyan
Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Applanation A scan
IOL master
ocular biometry
title Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
title_full Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
title_fullStr Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
title_short Comparison of ocular biometry parameters between IOL Master and applanation A-scan in eyes with short, medium, long, and very long axial lengths
title_sort comparison of ocular biometry parameters between iol master and applanation a scan in eyes with short medium long and very long axial lengths
topic Applanation A scan
IOL master
ocular biometry
url http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=35;epage=40;aulast=Gopi
work_keys_str_mv AT rimplegopi comparisonofocularbiometryparametersbetweeniolmasterandapplanationascanineyeswithshortmediumlongandverylongaxiallengths
AT sanithasathyan comparisonofocularbiometryparametersbetweeniolmasterandapplanationascanineyeswithshortmediumlongandverylongaxiallengths