Digital democracy: A systematic literature review
Digital democracy provides a new space for community involvement in democratic life. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to uncover the trend of concepts in the study of digital democracy. This study used descriptive analysis with data sources derived from the Scopus database f...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Political Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802/full |
_version_ | 1811168287750356992 |
---|---|
author | Umar Congge María-Dolores Guillamón Achmad Nurmandi Salahudin Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi |
author_facet | Umar Congge María-Dolores Guillamón Achmad Nurmandi Salahudin Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi |
author_sort | Umar Congge |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Digital democracy provides a new space for community involvement in democratic life. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to uncover the trend of concepts in the study of digital democracy. This study used descriptive analysis with data sources derived from the Scopus database from the period between 2014 and 2020 (a total of 230 articles) and processed with VOSviewer. The results showed three dominant concepts, namely democracy, the internet, and movement. In addition, it was found that the digital era provides positive and negative impacts on democracy, that public knowledge in a quality digital democracy is important, and that there is strong elite control in virtual democracy. The results of this research can be used as a basis for developing digital democracy studies. Meanwhile, this study was limited by the fact that the articles reviewed were only sourced from Scopus and did not include publications from 2022. Therefore, future studies need to take a comparative analysis approach that uses the Web of Science (WoS) database and increases the time period in which articles are sourced. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:23:38Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8b1f70bf325c4919b3b8646db69c7180 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2673-3145 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:23:38Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Political Science |
spelling | doaj.art-8b1f70bf325c4919b3b8646db69c71802023-02-09T09:48:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452023-02-01510.3389/fpos.2023.972802972802Digital democracy: A systematic literature reviewUmar Congge0María-Dolores Guillamón1Achmad Nurmandi2 Salahudin3Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi4Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Mahammadiyah Sinjai, Sinjai, IndonesiaDepartment of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, University of Murcia, Murcia, SpainDepartment of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaDepartment of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDigital democracy provides a new space for community involvement in democratic life. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to uncover the trend of concepts in the study of digital democracy. This study used descriptive analysis with data sources derived from the Scopus database from the period between 2014 and 2020 (a total of 230 articles) and processed with VOSviewer. The results showed three dominant concepts, namely democracy, the internet, and movement. In addition, it was found that the digital era provides positive and negative impacts on democracy, that public knowledge in a quality digital democracy is important, and that there is strong elite control in virtual democracy. The results of this research can be used as a basis for developing digital democracy studies. Meanwhile, this study was limited by the fact that the articles reviewed were only sourced from Scopus and did not include publications from 2022. Therefore, future studies need to take a comparative analysis approach that uses the Web of Science (WoS) database and increases the time period in which articles are sourced.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802/fulldigital democracygovernmentparticipationsocial mediainternetmovement |
spellingShingle | Umar Congge María-Dolores Guillamón Achmad Nurmandi Salahudin Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi Digital democracy: A systematic literature review Frontiers in Political Science digital democracy government participation social media internet movement |
title | Digital democracy: A systematic literature review |
title_full | Digital democracy: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Digital democracy: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital democracy: A systematic literature review |
title_short | Digital democracy: A systematic literature review |
title_sort | digital democracy a systematic literature review |
topic | digital democracy government participation social media internet movement |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT umarcongge digitaldemocracyasystematicliteraturereview AT mariadoloresguillamon digitaldemocracyasystematicliteraturereview AT achmadnurmandi digitaldemocracyasystematicliteraturereview AT salahudin digitaldemocracyasystematicliteraturereview AT iradhadtaqwasihidi digitaldemocracyasystematicliteraturereview |