KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Manuscrito |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818979149858996224 |
---|---|
author | Owen Goldin |
author_facet | Owen Goldin |
author_sort | Owen Goldin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clarifying the logical structure of demonstration in general. If we identify the basic subjects with what has no different cause, and demonstrable attributes (the kath’ hauta sumbebēkota) with what do have ‘a different cause’, the definitions of demonstrable attributes necessarily have the minor terms of the appropriate demonstrations in their definitions, for which reason the subjects and demonstrable attributes are coextensive. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T16:54:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8b27934e1c7746d982d1ca10fde4bc9c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2317-630X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T16:54:57Z |
publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
record_format | Article |
series | Manuscrito |
spelling | doaj.art-8b27934e1c7746d982d1ca10fde4bc9c2022-12-21T19:32:45ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2019-11-01424448410.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n4.ogKATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’Owen Goldinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-6578Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clarifying the logical structure of demonstration in general. If we identify the basic subjects with what has no different cause, and demonstrable attributes (the kath’ hauta sumbebēkota) with what do have ‘a different cause’, the definitions of demonstrable attributes necessarily have the minor terms of the appropriate demonstrations in their definitions, for which reason the subjects and demonstrable attributes are coextensive.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=enAristotleDemonstrationExplanationUniversal |
spellingShingle | Owen Goldin KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ Manuscrito Aristotle Demonstration Explanation Universal |
title | KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ |
title_full | KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ |
title_fullStr | KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ |
title_full_unstemmed | KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ |
title_short | KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ |
title_sort | kath hauta predicates and the commensurate universals |
topic | Aristotle Demonstration Explanation Universal |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owengoldin kathhautapredicatesandthecommensurateuniversals |