KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’

Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Owen Goldin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2019-11-01
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=en
_version_ 1818979149858996224
author Owen Goldin
author_facet Owen Goldin
author_sort Owen Goldin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clarifying the logical structure of demonstration in general. If we identify the basic subjects with what has no different cause, and demonstrable attributes (the kath’ hauta sumbebēkota) with what do have ‘a different cause’, the definitions of demonstrable attributes necessarily have the minor terms of the appropriate demonstrations in their definitions, for which reason the subjects and demonstrable attributes are coextensive.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:54:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b27934e1c7746d982d1ca10fde4bc9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2317-630X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:54:57Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj.art-8b27934e1c7746d982d1ca10fde4bc9c2022-12-21T19:32:45ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2019-11-01424448410.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n4.ogKATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’Owen Goldinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-6578Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clarifying the logical structure of demonstration in general. If we identify the basic subjects with what has no different cause, and demonstrable attributes (the kath’ hauta sumbebēkota) with what do have ‘a different cause’, the definitions of demonstrable attributes necessarily have the minor terms of the appropriate demonstrations in their definitions, for which reason the subjects and demonstrable attributes are coextensive.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=enAristotleDemonstrationExplanationUniversal
spellingShingle Owen Goldin
KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
Manuscrito
Aristotle
Demonstration
Explanation
Universal
title KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
title_full KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
title_fullStr KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
title_full_unstemmed KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
title_short KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’
title_sort kath hauta predicates and the commensurate universals
topic Aristotle
Demonstration
Explanation
Universal
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000400044&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT owengoldin kathhautapredicatesandthecommensurateuniversals