The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy
The aim of the Minsk group of OSCE established on March 1992 was to mediate the peaceful solution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: “From December 1996, the Minsk Group is co-chaired by three states – Russia, the United States and France. But unfortunately the conflict still remai...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2017-11-01
|
| Series: | Американська історія і політика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.americanstudies.history.knu.ua/en/the-karabagh-conflict-in-the-context-of-the-united-states-global-policy/ |
| _version_ | 1827397900840206336 |
|---|---|
| author | Farahile Babaeva Shukurova |
| author_facet | Farahile Babaeva Shukurova |
| author_sort | Farahile Babaeva Shukurova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the Minsk group of OSCE established on March 1992 was to mediate the peaceful solution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: “From December 1996, the Minsk Group is co-chaired by three states – Russia, the United States and France. But unfortunately the conflict still remains unresolved. Zero progress has been reached so far in the negotiation mediated by the Minsk group. Armenia is not interested in resolution of the conflict. It tends to keep the position of neither fire, nor peace. But in the early April of 2016, as result of subversion of Armenian armed forces the tension in the contact line of troops which was followed by numerous human causalities, once more confirmed that remaining the conflict frozen might would always cause the intense war.” But the international mediators for some reason wouldn’t demonstrate any unequivocal position upon this case although they support the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. It is expected that the members of the Minsk group of the OSCE, as well as global community would take precise measures to solve this problem fairly. Failure to adhere to the principle of justice would draw to crisis not only the region, but also worldwide. The reality is that, the USA, Russia and France wouldn’t bring the aggressor down as a neither permanent member of the UN SC, nor as a member states. It is a painful and thought-provoking truth, but it is still the case. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:18:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8b380f5365ae4b50b9ad44dab8e76e58 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2521-1706 2521-1714 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:18:41Z |
| publishDate | 2017-11-01 |
| publisher | Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Американська історія і політика |
| spelling | doaj.art-8b380f5365ae4b50b9ad44dab8e76e582023-12-26T22:18:16ZengTaras Shevchenko National University of KyivАмериканська історія і політика2521-17062521-17142017-11-014160169The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policyFarahile Babaeva Shukurova0National University Republic of AzerbaijanThe aim of the Minsk group of OSCE established on March 1992 was to mediate the peaceful solution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: “From December 1996, the Minsk Group is co-chaired by three states – Russia, the United States and France. But unfortunately the conflict still remains unresolved. Zero progress has been reached so far in the negotiation mediated by the Minsk group. Armenia is not interested in resolution of the conflict. It tends to keep the position of neither fire, nor peace. But in the early April of 2016, as result of subversion of Armenian armed forces the tension in the contact line of troops which was followed by numerous human causalities, once more confirmed that remaining the conflict frozen might would always cause the intense war.” But the international mediators for some reason wouldn’t demonstrate any unequivocal position upon this case although they support the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. It is expected that the members of the Minsk group of the OSCE, as well as global community would take precise measures to solve this problem fairly. Failure to adhere to the principle of justice would draw to crisis not only the region, but also worldwide. The reality is that, the USA, Russia and France wouldn’t bring the aggressor down as a neither permanent member of the UN SC, nor as a member states. It is a painful and thought-provoking truth, but it is still the case.http://www.americanstudies.history.knu.ua/en/the-karabagh-conflict-in-the-context-of-the-united-states-global-policy/conflictusaunescopolitics |
| spellingShingle | Farahile Babaeva Shukurova The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy Американська історія і політика conflict usa un esco politics |
| title | The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy |
| title_full | The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy |
| title_fullStr | The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy |
| title_short | The Karabagh conflict in the context of the United States’ global policy |
| title_sort | karabagh conflict in the context of the united states global policy |
| topic | conflict usa un esco politics |
| url | http://www.americanstudies.history.knu.ua/en/the-karabagh-conflict-in-the-context-of-the-united-states-global-policy/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT farahilebabaevashukurova thekarabaghconflictinthecontextoftheunitedstatesglobalpolicy AT farahilebabaevashukurova karabaghconflictinthecontextoftheunitedstatesglobalpolicy |