The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020

Abstract Elective procedures were temporarily suspended several times over the course of the pandemic of COVID-19. Monthly data from the Unified Health System (SUS) were used for the period between January 2008 and December 2020 and the interrupted time series method was used to estimate the effect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustavo Saraiva Frio, Letícia Xander Russo, Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Adriana Ferreira Barros-Areal, Andréa Pedrosa Ribeiro Alves Oliveira, João Firmino-Machado, Everton Nunes da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13746-5
_version_ 1818235769540575232
author Gustavo Saraiva Frio
Letícia Xander Russo
Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque
Licia Maria Henrique da Mota
Adriana Ferreira Barros-Areal
Andréa Pedrosa Ribeiro Alves Oliveira
João Firmino-Machado
Everton Nunes da Silva
author_facet Gustavo Saraiva Frio
Letícia Xander Russo
Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque
Licia Maria Henrique da Mota
Adriana Ferreira Barros-Areal
Andréa Pedrosa Ribeiro Alves Oliveira
João Firmino-Machado
Everton Nunes da Silva
author_sort Gustavo Saraiva Frio
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Elective procedures were temporarily suspended several times over the course of the pandemic of COVID-19. Monthly data from the Unified Health System (SUS) were used for the period between January 2008 and December 2020 and the interrupted time series method was used to estimate the effect of the pandemic on the number of elective surgeries and elective procedures that were not performed. Considering a 9-month period, a reduction of 46% in the number of elective procedures carried out in the SUS could be attributed to COVID-19, corresponding to about 828,429 elective procedures cancelled, ranging from 549,921 to 1,106,936. To a full recovery of pre-pandemic performance, SUS would need to increase about 21,362 hospital beds, ranging from 12,370 to 36,392 hospital beds during a 6 month-period. This effort would represent an increase of 8.48% (ranging from 4.91 to 14.45%) in relation to the total number of SUS’s hospital beds in 2019. As a result, the pandemic will leave a large number of elective procedures to be carried out, which will require efforts by health agencies to meet this demand.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T11:59:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b3b2e24981b4b00a4354c1d785b0c13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T11:59:14Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-8b3b2e24981b4b00a4354c1d785b0c132022-12-22T00:25:09ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-011211810.1038/s41598-022-13746-5The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020Gustavo Saraiva Frio0Letícia Xander Russo1Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque2Licia Maria Henrique da Mota3Adriana Ferreira Barros-Areal4Andréa Pedrosa Ribeiro Alves Oliveira5João Firmino-Machado6Everton Nunes da Silva7Graduate Program in Collective Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of BrasiliaDepartment of Economics, Federal University of Grande DouradosGraduate Program in Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Brasília, University of BrasiliaGraduate Program in Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of BrasiliaGraduate Program in Medical Science, Health Department of the Federal District (SES/DF), Faculty of Medicine, University of BrasiliaFaculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Brasília, University of BrasíliaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Public Health (ISPUP), University of PortoGraduate Program in Collective Health, Faculty of Health Science, Faculty of Ceilândia, University of BrasiliaAbstract Elective procedures were temporarily suspended several times over the course of the pandemic of COVID-19. Monthly data from the Unified Health System (SUS) were used for the period between January 2008 and December 2020 and the interrupted time series method was used to estimate the effect of the pandemic on the number of elective surgeries and elective procedures that were not performed. Considering a 9-month period, a reduction of 46% in the number of elective procedures carried out in the SUS could be attributed to COVID-19, corresponding to about 828,429 elective procedures cancelled, ranging from 549,921 to 1,106,936. To a full recovery of pre-pandemic performance, SUS would need to increase about 21,362 hospital beds, ranging from 12,370 to 36,392 hospital beds during a 6 month-period. This effort would represent an increase of 8.48% (ranging from 4.91 to 14.45%) in relation to the total number of SUS’s hospital beds in 2019. As a result, the pandemic will leave a large number of elective procedures to be carried out, which will require efforts by health agencies to meet this demand.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13746-5
spellingShingle Gustavo Saraiva Frio
Letícia Xander Russo
Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque
Licia Maria Henrique da Mota
Adriana Ferreira Barros-Areal
Andréa Pedrosa Ribeiro Alves Oliveira
João Firmino-Machado
Everton Nunes da Silva
The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
Scientific Reports
title The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
title_full The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
title_fullStr The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
title_full_unstemmed The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
title_short The disruption of elective procedures due to COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020
title_sort disruption of elective procedures due to covid 19 in brazil in 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13746-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gustavosaraivafrio thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT leticiaxanderrusso thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT cleandropiresdealbuquerque thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT liciamariahenriquedamota thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT adrianaferreirabarrosareal thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT andreapedrosaribeiroalvesoliveira thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT joaofirminomachado thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT evertonnunesdasilva thedisruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT gustavosaraivafrio disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT leticiaxanderrusso disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT cleandropiresdealbuquerque disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT liciamariahenriquedamota disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT adrianaferreirabarrosareal disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT andreapedrosaribeiroalvesoliveira disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT joaofirminomachado disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020
AT evertonnunesdasilva disruptionofelectiveproceduresduetocovid19inbrazilin2020