SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS

Contemporary criminal procedure legislation establishes some features of the procedure for criminal proceedings relating to terrorist crimes. However, the size and importance of such features are so insignificant that there is no differentiation in the form of proceedings in this group. Meanwhile, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bashkir State University 2022-12-01
Series:Правовое государство: теория и практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/706
_version_ 1797943585372372992
author DIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich
author_facet DIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich
author_sort DIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary criminal procedure legislation establishes some features of the procedure for criminal proceedings relating to terrorist crimes. However, the size and importance of such features are so insignificant that there is no differentiation in the form of proceedings in this group. Meanwhile, in the second half of the 19th and early 20th century, military criminal proceedings in Russia were characterized by significant specifics in criminal cases involving state crimes. The study of historical experience seems to be very useful for determining the directions for improving the current legislation, because in contemporary criminal proceedings, the consideration of criminal cases on terrorist crimes is attributed to the competence of military courts. Purpose: to identify the peculiarities of criminal proceedings concerning state crimes related to terrorist activities used in the military courts of tsarist Russia, and on the basis of a comparative analysis with the current procedure, to outline ways to improve modern criminal procedure legislation. Methods: the dialectical method is the methodological basis of the study. In addition, general scientific me-thods of analysis, synthesis and a systematic approach are used, as well as special le-gal methods: historical-legal, legal interpretation and logical-legal. Results: the study shows that the steps taken by the modern legislator in regulating criminal proceedings on terrorist crimes largely repeat the processes that took place in the legislation of the Russian Empire during the period when the country faced an unprecedented terrorist threat. At the same time, the historical and legal analysis reveals gaps in the current regulation of procedural activities, such as the lack of influence of special legal regimes (including the legal regime of the counter-terrorism operation) on the procedural form of criminal proceedings.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:25:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b3e9976c1da461294f6791d547560db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-0217
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:25:26Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Bashkir State University
record_format Article
series Правовое государство: теория и практика
spelling doaj.art-8b3e9976c1da461294f6791d547560db2023-01-25T11:32:05ZengBashkir State UniversityПравовое государство: теория и практика2500-02172022-12-01184(70)13013710.33184/pravgos-2022.4.18SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELSDIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-744XVolgograd State UniversityContemporary criminal procedure legislation establishes some features of the procedure for criminal proceedings relating to terrorist crimes. However, the size and importance of such features are so insignificant that there is no differentiation in the form of proceedings in this group. Meanwhile, in the second half of the 19th and early 20th century, military criminal proceedings in Russia were characterized by significant specifics in criminal cases involving state crimes. The study of historical experience seems to be very useful for determining the directions for improving the current legislation, because in contemporary criminal proceedings, the consideration of criminal cases on terrorist crimes is attributed to the competence of military courts. Purpose: to identify the peculiarities of criminal proceedings concerning state crimes related to terrorist activities used in the military courts of tsarist Russia, and on the basis of a comparative analysis with the current procedure, to outline ways to improve modern criminal procedure legislation. Methods: the dialectical method is the methodological basis of the study. In addition, general scientific me-thods of analysis, synthesis and a systematic approach are used, as well as special le-gal methods: historical-legal, legal interpretation and logical-legal. Results: the study shows that the steps taken by the modern legislator in regulating criminal proceedings on terrorist crimes largely repeat the processes that took place in the legislation of the Russian Empire during the period when the country faced an unprecedented terrorist threat. At the same time, the historical and legal analysis reveals gaps in the current regulation of procedural activities, such as the lack of influence of special legal regimes (including the legal regime of the counter-terrorism operation) on the procedural form of criminal proceedings.https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/706military courtjurisdictionprocedural formpublicityterrorismterrorist crimes
spellingShingle DIKAREV Ilya Stepanovich
SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
Правовое государство: теория и практика
military court
jurisdiction
procedural form
publicity
terrorism
terrorist crimes
title SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
title_full SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
title_fullStr SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
title_full_unstemmed SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
title_short SPECIAL PROCEDURE FOR MILITARY COURTS TO TRY TERRORIST CRIMES: HISTORICAL PARALLELS
title_sort special procedure for military courts to try terrorist crimes historical parallels
topic military court
jurisdiction
procedural form
publicity
terrorism
terrorist crimes
url https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/706
work_keys_str_mv AT dikarevilyastepanovich specialprocedureformilitarycourtstotryterroristcrimeshistoricalparallels