Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review

Introduction: The prevalence of focal cartilage defects in elite athletes is estimated to be as high as 36%, and treatment in professional football players poses a complex clinical challenge. Marrow stimulation is a common treatment option for athletes with symptomatic, contained, full-thickness cho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zachary D. Meeker, Nolan S. Horner, Kyle R. Wagner, Joshua T. Kaiser, Armaan F. Mazra, Brian J. Cole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000257
_version_ 1811245178120306688
author Zachary D. Meeker
Nolan S. Horner
Kyle R. Wagner
Joshua T. Kaiser
Armaan F. Mazra
Brian J. Cole
author_facet Zachary D. Meeker
Nolan S. Horner
Kyle R. Wagner
Joshua T. Kaiser
Armaan F. Mazra
Brian J. Cole
author_sort Zachary D. Meeker
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The prevalence of focal cartilage defects in elite athletes is estimated to be as high as 36%, and treatment in professional football players poses a complex clinical challenge. Marrow stimulation is a common treatment option for athletes with symptomatic, contained, full-thickness chondral injuries. Objectives: To report the current indications for and efficacy of marrow stimulation in football players. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched. All levels of evidence (I-IV) pertaining to marrow stimulation in football players were analyzed and presented in a narrative review. Results: Reported return to sport rates following microfracture range from 52% to 95%, with up to 67% of athletes returning to preinjury level of performance. Clinical outcomes improve shortly after microfracture but may decline by 2 years postoperatively. Augmented marrow stimulation techniques have since been developed in an effort to improve repair quality and clinical outcomes, though supporting data is limited. Conclusion: In professional football players, marrow stimulation is a viable treatment for the repair of small (<2 cm2), isolated cartilage injuries, though deterioration of mid- to long-term outcomes may hamper its widespread use. Multiple augmentation techniques have demonstrated the potential to generate a mechanically and biologically superior repair; however, more robust, high-level studies are needed to adequately assess efficacy.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:36:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b45d85801a2475bb63264a97623af1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-2545
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:36:17Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation
spelling doaj.art-8b45d85801a2475bb63264a97623af1f2022-12-22T03:29:04ZengElsevierJournal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation2667-25452022-06-0122100063Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative reviewZachary D. Meeker0Nolan S. Horner1Kyle R. Wagner2Joshua T. Kaiser3Armaan F. Mazra4Brian J. Cole5Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Brian J. Cole, Department of Orthopedics, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison, Chicago, IL 60612.Introduction: The prevalence of focal cartilage defects in elite athletes is estimated to be as high as 36%, and treatment in professional football players poses a complex clinical challenge. Marrow stimulation is a common treatment option for athletes with symptomatic, contained, full-thickness chondral injuries. Objectives: To report the current indications for and efficacy of marrow stimulation in football players. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched. All levels of evidence (I-IV) pertaining to marrow stimulation in football players were analyzed and presented in a narrative review. Results: Reported return to sport rates following microfracture range from 52% to 95%, with up to 67% of athletes returning to preinjury level of performance. Clinical outcomes improve shortly after microfracture but may decline by 2 years postoperatively. Augmented marrow stimulation techniques have since been developed in an effort to improve repair quality and clinical outcomes, though supporting data is limited. Conclusion: In professional football players, marrow stimulation is a viable treatment for the repair of small (<2 cm2), isolated cartilage injuries, though deterioration of mid- to long-term outcomes may hamper its widespread use. Multiple augmentation techniques have demonstrated the potential to generate a mechanically and biologically superior repair; however, more robust, high-level studies are needed to adequately assess efficacy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000257MicrofractureFootballReturn-to-sportCartilageBiologicsRestoration
spellingShingle Zachary D. Meeker
Nolan S. Horner
Kyle R. Wagner
Joshua T. Kaiser
Armaan F. Mazra
Brian J. Cole
Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation
Microfracture
Football
Return-to-sport
Cartilage
Biologics
Restoration
title Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
title_full Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
title_fullStr Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
title_short Marrow stimulation in football (soccer) players: a narrative review
title_sort marrow stimulation in football soccer players a narrative review
topic Microfracture
Football
Return-to-sport
Cartilage
Biologics
Restoration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000257
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharydmeeker marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview
AT nolanshorner marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview
AT kylerwagner marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview
AT joshuatkaiser marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview
AT armaanfmazra marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview
AT brianjcole marrowstimulationinfootballsoccerplayersanarrativereview