Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014
The news media play an influential role in shaping public attitudes on a wide range of issues—climate change included. As climate change has risen in salience, the average American is much more likely to be exposed to news coverage now than in the past. Yet, we don't have a clear understanding...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006/full |
| _version_ | 1818055569902141440 |
|---|---|
| author | Dominik A. Stecula Dominik A. Stecula Eric Merkley |
| author_facet | Dominik A. Stecula Dominik A. Stecula Eric Merkley |
| author_sort | Dominik A. Stecula |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The news media play an influential role in shaping public attitudes on a wide range of issues—climate change included. As climate change has risen in salience, the average American is much more likely to be exposed to news coverage now than in the past. Yet, we don't have a clear understanding of how the content of this news coverage has changed over time, despite likely playing an important part in fostering or inhibiting public support and engagement in climate action. In this paper we use a combination of automated and manual content analysis of the most influential media sources in the U.S. -the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press- to illustrate the prevalence of different frames in the news coverage of climate change and their dynamics over time from the start of the climate change debate in 1988. Specifically, we focus on three types of frames, based on previous research: economic costs and benefits associated with climate mitigation, appeals to conservative and free market values and principles, and uncertainties and risk surrounding climate change. We find that many of the frames found to reduce people's propensity to support and engage in climate action have been on the decline in the mainstream media, such as frames emphasizing potential economic harms of climate mitigation policy or uncertainty. At the same time, frames conducive to such engagement by the general public have been on the rise, such as those highlighting economic benefits of climate action. News content is also more likely now than in the past to use language emphasizing risk and danger, and to use the present tense. To the extent that media framing plays an important role in fostering climate action in the public, these are welcome developments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T12:15:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8b485f04169844269c77b88430f5e6a8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2297-900X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T12:15:02Z |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Communication |
| spelling | doaj.art-8b485f04169844269c77b88430f5e6a82022-12-22T01:49:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2019-02-01410.3389/fcomm.2019.00006423428Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014Dominik A. Stecula0Dominik A. Stecula1Eric Merkley2Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesDepartment of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaDepartment of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaThe news media play an influential role in shaping public attitudes on a wide range of issues—climate change included. As climate change has risen in salience, the average American is much more likely to be exposed to news coverage now than in the past. Yet, we don't have a clear understanding of how the content of this news coverage has changed over time, despite likely playing an important part in fostering or inhibiting public support and engagement in climate action. In this paper we use a combination of automated and manual content analysis of the most influential media sources in the U.S. -the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press- to illustrate the prevalence of different frames in the news coverage of climate change and their dynamics over time from the start of the climate change debate in 1988. Specifically, we focus on three types of frames, based on previous research: economic costs and benefits associated with climate mitigation, appeals to conservative and free market values and principles, and uncertainties and risk surrounding climate change. We find that many of the frames found to reduce people's propensity to support and engage in climate action have been on the decline in the mainstream media, such as frames emphasizing potential economic harms of climate mitigation policy or uncertainty. At the same time, frames conducive to such engagement by the general public have been on the rise, such as those highlighting economic benefits of climate action. News content is also more likely now than in the past to use language emphasizing risk and danger, and to use the present tense. To the extent that media framing plays an important role in fostering climate action in the public, these are welcome developments.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006/fullclimate changeframingglobal warmingscience communicationnews media |
| spellingShingle | Dominik A. Stecula Dominik A. Stecula Eric Merkley Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 Frontiers in Communication climate change framing global warming science communication news media |
| title | Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 |
| title_full | Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 |
| title_fullStr | Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 |
| title_short | Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 |
| title_sort | framing climate change economics ideology and uncertainty in american news media content from 1988 to 2014 |
| topic | climate change framing global warming science communication news media |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dominikastecula framingclimatechangeeconomicsideologyanduncertaintyinamericannewsmediacontentfrom1988to2014 AT dominikastecula framingclimatechangeeconomicsideologyanduncertaintyinamericannewsmediacontentfrom1988to2014 AT ericmerkley framingclimatechangeeconomicsideologyanduncertaintyinamericannewsmediacontentfrom1988to2014 |