Different N—H...π interactions in two indole derivatives

We describe the syntheses and crystal structures of two indole derivatives, namely 6-isopropyl-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C19H20N2O2, (I), and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C23H20N2O3, (II); the latter crystallizes with two molecules (A and B) with similar confor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie R. Kerr, Laurent Trembleau, John M. D. Storey, James L. Wardell, William T. A. Harrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Union of Crystallography 2016-05-01
Series:Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2056989016006162
Description
Summary:We describe the syntheses and crystal structures of two indole derivatives, namely 6-isopropyl-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C19H20N2O2, (I), and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C23H20N2O3, (II); the latter crystallizes with two molecules (A and B) with similar conformations (r.m.s. overlay fit = 0.139 Å) in the asymmetric unit. Despite the presence of O atoms as potential acceptors for classical hydrogen bonds, the dominant intermolecular interaction in each crystal is an N—H...π bond, which generates chains in (I) and A+A and B+B inversion dimers in (II). A different aromatic ring acts as the acceptor in each case. The packing is consolidated by C—H...π interactions in each case but aromatic π–π stacking interactions are absent.
ISSN:2056-9890