0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna

During the course of the 19th century, Czech society underwent an intensive process of national revival and emancipation from Vienna. This, of course, was also projected onto the field of visual arts: For a long time, under the influence of Czech nationalists, surveys of developments in the arts fie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Krummholz
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA) 2021-07-01
Series:RIHA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/81896
_version_ 1797430819113926656
author Martin Krummholz
author_facet Martin Krummholz
author_sort Martin Krummholz
collection DOAJ
description During the course of the 19th century, Czech society underwent an intensive process of national revival and emancipation from Vienna. This, of course, was also projected onto the field of visual arts: For a long time, under the influence of Czech nationalists, surveys of developments in the arts field did not include German-speaking artists from the Czech lands, such as the brothers Max and Franz Metzner or Hugo Lederer. Contacts between both individuals and institutions and Vienna thus became extremely complicated, and after 1900 they were generally considered undesirable by Czech nationalists. In 1902, the Mánes Fine Arts Association, which can take much of the credit for promoting modern art in the Czech milieu at that time, organized an exhibition in Prague of the works of Auguste Rodin, whose artistic style fundamentally influenced Czech sculpture in the first decade of the 20th century and disrupted the monopoly enjoyed until then by Josef Václav Myslbek. In contrast to Myslbek’s conventional equestrian monument to St Wenceslas, two other national monuments in Prague, the statues of Jan Hus (by Ladislav Šaloun) and of František Palacký (by Stanislav Sucharda) reflect the fascination with Rodinesque pathos at that time. The politically motivated suppression of contacts between the Czech milieu and Vienna and German-speaking countries on the one hand, and the support for intensive communication with Paris on the other, contributed to the progressive tendencies in Czech art before the First World War and to its exceptional plurality of styles.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:33:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b68202d9c6e4101a86cf7f2dcb091e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2190-3328
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:33:03Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA)
record_format Article
series RIHA Journal
spelling doaj.art-8b68202d9c6e4101a86cf7f2dcb091e92023-12-02T02:56:25ZdeuInternational Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA)RIHA Journal2190-33282021-07-0110.11588/riha.2021.1.818961344550265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards ViennaMartin KrummholzDuring the course of the 19th century, Czech society underwent an intensive process of national revival and emancipation from Vienna. This, of course, was also projected onto the field of visual arts: For a long time, under the influence of Czech nationalists, surveys of developments in the arts field did not include German-speaking artists from the Czech lands, such as the brothers Max and Franz Metzner or Hugo Lederer. Contacts between both individuals and institutions and Vienna thus became extremely complicated, and after 1900 they were generally considered undesirable by Czech nationalists. In 1902, the Mánes Fine Arts Association, which can take much of the credit for promoting modern art in the Czech milieu at that time, organized an exhibition in Prague of the works of Auguste Rodin, whose artistic style fundamentally influenced Czech sculpture in the first decade of the 20th century and disrupted the monopoly enjoyed until then by Josef Václav Myslbek. In contrast to Myslbek’s conventional equestrian monument to St Wenceslas, two other national monuments in Prague, the statues of Jan Hus (by Ladislav Šaloun) and of František Palacký (by Stanislav Sucharda) reflect the fascination with Rodinesque pathos at that time. The politically motivated suppression of contacts between the Czech milieu and Vienna and German-speaking countries on the one hand, and the support for intensive communication with Paris on the other, contributed to the progressive tendencies in Czech art before the First World War and to its exceptional plurality of styles.https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/8189619th centuryczechbohemianpragueviennasculpturemonumentnationalismmodernism
spellingShingle Martin Krummholz
0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
RIHA Journal
19th century
czech
bohemian
prague
vienna
sculpture
monument
nationalism
modernism
title 0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
title_full 0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
title_fullStr 0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
title_full_unstemmed 0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
title_short 0265 Czech Sculpture in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Its Attitude Towards Vienna
title_sort 0265 czech sculpture in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and its attitude towards vienna
topic 19th century
czech
bohemian
prague
vienna
sculpture
monument
nationalism
modernism
url https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/rihajournal/article/view/81896
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkrummholz 0265czechsculptureinthelate19thandearly20thcenturiesanditsattitudetowardsvienna