An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics
The starting point of this paper is Hannah Arendt’s diagnosis that the introduction of philosophical truth into politics leads to tyrannical or totalitarian outcomes. A critique of this diagnosis is offered on the basis of Michel Foucault’s last lectures at the Collège de France where he discussed t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The University of Akureyri
2014-11-01
|
| Series: | Nordicum-Mediterraneum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://nome.unak.is/nm-marzo-2012/vol-9-no-4-2014/75-conference-paper/515-an-apology-for-philosophy-on-the-contested-relationship-between-truth-and-politics |
| _version_ | 1827365903548809216 |
|---|---|
| author | Signe Larsen |
| author_facet | Signe Larsen |
| author_sort | Signe Larsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The starting point of this paper is Hannah Arendt’s diagnosis that the introduction of philosophical truth into politics leads to tyrannical or totalitarian outcomes. A critique of this diagnosis is offered on the basis of Michel Foucault’s last lectures at the Collège de France where he discussed the practices of parrēsia, “truth-telling,” as multiple forms of political life of resistance, critique, and contestation. The common denominator of all parrhēsiastic practices is that none of them are concerned with “doctrines.” That is, none of them are concerned with laying out the “content” of politics. After the paper has identified and expounded four different manifestations of parrēsia—“political” (Pericles), “philosophical” (Plato), “philosophical-ethical” (Socrates) and “ethical” (Diogenes the Cynic)—an argument is presented for a kinship, instead of a difference, between Foucault and Arendt as parrhēsiastic or critical thinkers within the same tradition of political Kantianism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:38:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8b6e947b491e42c0b46f3e3c9d7da36c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1670-6242 1670-6242 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:38:28Z |
| publishDate | 2014-11-01 |
| publisher | The University of Akureyri |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nordicum-Mediterraneum |
| spelling | doaj.art-8b6e947b491e42c0b46f3e3c9d7da36c2024-02-02T00:17:54ZengThe University of AkureyriNordicum-Mediterraneum1670-62421670-62422014-11-0194A8An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politicsSigne LarsenThe starting point of this paper is Hannah Arendt’s diagnosis that the introduction of philosophical truth into politics leads to tyrannical or totalitarian outcomes. A critique of this diagnosis is offered on the basis of Michel Foucault’s last lectures at the Collège de France where he discussed the practices of parrēsia, “truth-telling,” as multiple forms of political life of resistance, critique, and contestation. The common denominator of all parrhēsiastic practices is that none of them are concerned with “doctrines.” That is, none of them are concerned with laying out the “content” of politics. After the paper has identified and expounded four different manifestations of parrēsia—“political” (Pericles), “philosophical” (Plato), “philosophical-ethical” (Socrates) and “ethical” (Diogenes the Cynic)—an argument is presented for a kinship, instead of a difference, between Foucault and Arendt as parrhēsiastic or critical thinkers within the same tradition of political Kantianism.http://nome.unak.is/nm-marzo-2012/vol-9-no-4-2014/75-conference-paper/515-an-apology-for-philosophy-on-the-contested-relationship-between-truth-and-politicsParrēsiaMichel FoucaultHannah Arendtcynicismpolitical Kantianism |
| spellingShingle | Signe Larsen An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics Nordicum-Mediterraneum Parrēsia Michel Foucault Hannah Arendt cynicism political Kantianism |
| title | An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| title_full | An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| title_fullStr | An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| title_short | An Apology for Philosophy: On the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| title_sort | apology for philosophy on the contested relationship between truth and politics |
| topic | Parrēsia Michel Foucault Hannah Arendt cynicism political Kantianism |
| url | http://nome.unak.is/nm-marzo-2012/vol-9-no-4-2014/75-conference-paper/515-an-apology-for-philosophy-on-the-contested-relationship-between-truth-and-politics |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT signelarsen anapologyforphilosophyonthecontestedrelationshipbetweentruthandpolitics AT signelarsen apologyforphilosophyonthecontestedrelationshipbetweentruthandpolitics |