Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.

<h4>Objective</h4>Poor reporting in randomized clinical trial (RCT) abstracts reduces quality and misinforms readers. Spin, a biased presentation of findings, could frequently mislead clinicians to accept a clinical intervention despite non-significant primary outcome. Therefore, good re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murad Shaqman, Khadijeh Al-Abedalla, Julie Wagner, Helen Swede, John Cart Gunsolley, Effie Ioannidou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230843
_version_ 1819100076564283392
author Murad Shaqman
Khadijeh Al-Abedalla
Julie Wagner
Helen Swede
John Cart Gunsolley
Effie Ioannidou
author_facet Murad Shaqman
Khadijeh Al-Abedalla
Julie Wagner
Helen Swede
John Cart Gunsolley
Effie Ioannidou
author_sort Murad Shaqman
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>Poor reporting in randomized clinical trial (RCT) abstracts reduces quality and misinforms readers. Spin, a biased presentation of findings, could frequently mislead clinicians to accept a clinical intervention despite non-significant primary outcome. Therefore, good reporting practices and absence of spin enhances research quality. We aim to assess the reporting quality and spin in abstracts of RCTs evaluating the effect of periodontal therapy on cardiovascular (CVD) outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and 17 trial registration platforms were searched. Cohort, non-randomized, non-English studies, and pediatric studies were excluded. RCT abstracts were reviewed by 2 authors using the CONSORT for abstracts and spin checklists for data extraction. Cohen's Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement. Data on the selected RCT publication metrics were collected. Descriptive analysis was performed with non-parametric methods. Correlation analysis between quality, spin and bibliometric parameters was conducted.<h4>Results</h4>24 RCTs were selected for CONSORT analysis and 14 fulfilled the criteria for spin analysis. Several important RCT elements per CONSORT were neglected in the abstract including description of the study population (100%), explicitly stated primary outcome (87%), methods of randomization and blinding (100%), trial registration (87%). No RCT examined true outcomes (CVD events). A significant fraction of the abstracts appeared with at least one form of spin in the results and conclusions (86%) and claimed some treatment benefit in spite of non-significant primary outcome (64%). High-quality reporting had a significant positive correlation with reporting of trial registration (p = 0.04) and funding (p = 0.009). Spinning showed marginal negative correlation with reporting quality (p = 0.059).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Poor adherence to the CONSORT guidelines and high levels of data spin were found in abstracts of RCTs exploring the effects of periodontal therapy on CVD outcomes. Our findings indicate that journal editors and reviewers should consider strict adherence to proper reporting guidelines to improve reporting quality and reduce waste.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:57:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b705ba20a9546fa8d5edd028c6d84ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:57:01Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8b705ba20a9546fa8d5edd028c6d84ca2022-12-21T18:44:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01154e023084310.1371/journal.pone.0230843Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.Murad ShaqmanKhadijeh Al-AbedallaJulie WagnerHelen SwedeJohn Cart GunsolleyEffie Ioannidou<h4>Objective</h4>Poor reporting in randomized clinical trial (RCT) abstracts reduces quality and misinforms readers. Spin, a biased presentation of findings, could frequently mislead clinicians to accept a clinical intervention despite non-significant primary outcome. Therefore, good reporting practices and absence of spin enhances research quality. We aim to assess the reporting quality and spin in abstracts of RCTs evaluating the effect of periodontal therapy on cardiovascular (CVD) outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and 17 trial registration platforms were searched. Cohort, non-randomized, non-English studies, and pediatric studies were excluded. RCT abstracts were reviewed by 2 authors using the CONSORT for abstracts and spin checklists for data extraction. Cohen's Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement. Data on the selected RCT publication metrics were collected. Descriptive analysis was performed with non-parametric methods. Correlation analysis between quality, spin and bibliometric parameters was conducted.<h4>Results</h4>24 RCTs were selected for CONSORT analysis and 14 fulfilled the criteria for spin analysis. Several important RCT elements per CONSORT were neglected in the abstract including description of the study population (100%), explicitly stated primary outcome (87%), methods of randomization and blinding (100%), trial registration (87%). No RCT examined true outcomes (CVD events). A significant fraction of the abstracts appeared with at least one form of spin in the results and conclusions (86%) and claimed some treatment benefit in spite of non-significant primary outcome (64%). High-quality reporting had a significant positive correlation with reporting of trial registration (p = 0.04) and funding (p = 0.009). Spinning showed marginal negative correlation with reporting quality (p = 0.059).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Poor adherence to the CONSORT guidelines and high levels of data spin were found in abstracts of RCTs exploring the effects of periodontal therapy on CVD outcomes. Our findings indicate that journal editors and reviewers should consider strict adherence to proper reporting guidelines to improve reporting quality and reduce waste.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230843
spellingShingle Murad Shaqman
Khadijeh Al-Abedalla
Julie Wagner
Helen Swede
John Cart Gunsolley
Effie Ioannidou
Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
PLoS ONE
title Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
title_full Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
title_fullStr Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
title_full_unstemmed Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
title_short Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
title_sort reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230843
work_keys_str_mv AT muradshaqman reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes
AT khadijehalabedalla reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes
AT juliewagner reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes
AT helenswede reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes
AT johncartgunsolley reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes
AT effieioannidou reportingqualityandspininabstractsofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofperiodontaltherapyandcardiovasculardiseaseoutcomes