Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan

Background: This study was to perform an economic evaluation to understand clinical outcomes and health resource use between hip fracture patients receiving hospital-based postfracture fracture liaison service (FLS) care and those receiving usual care (UC) in Taiwan. Methods: This cohort study inclu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Nien Chien, Yi-Fan Li, Rong-Sen Yang, Tsung-Han Yang, Yi-Han Chen, Wei-Jia Huang, Hsin-Yi Tsai, Chun-Yi Li, Ding-Cheng Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664621002436
_version_ 1819174562919612416
author Li-Nien Chien
Yi-Fan Li
Rong-Sen Yang
Tsung-Han Yang
Yi-Han Chen
Wei-Jia Huang
Hsin-Yi Tsai
Chun-Yi Li
Ding-Cheng Chan
author_facet Li-Nien Chien
Yi-Fan Li
Rong-Sen Yang
Tsung-Han Yang
Yi-Han Chen
Wei-Jia Huang
Hsin-Yi Tsai
Chun-Yi Li
Ding-Cheng Chan
author_sort Li-Nien Chien
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study was to perform an economic evaluation to understand clinical outcomes and health resource use between hip fracture patients receiving hospital-based postfracture fracture liaison service (FLS) care and those receiving usual care (UC) in Taiwan. Methods: This cohort study included hospital-based data of 174 hip fracture patients who received FLS care (FLS group) from National Taiwan University Hospital, and 1697 propensity score-matched patients who received UC (UC group) of National Health Insurance claim-based data. Two groups had similar baseline characteristics but differed in hip fracture care after propensity score matching. Clinical outcomes included refracture-free survival (RFS), hip-refracture-free survival (HRFS), and overall survival (OS). Health resource use included inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs within 2 years follow-up after the index of hip fracture. The economic evaluation of the FLS model was analyzed using the net monetary benefit regression framework based on the National Health Insurance perspective. Results: The FLS group had longer RFS than the UC group, with an adjusted difference of 44.3 days (95% confidence interval: 7.2–81.4 days). Two groups did not differ in inpatient and outpatient costs during follow-up, but the FLS group had a higher expenditure than the UC group on osteoporosis-related medication. The probability of FLS being cost-effective was >80% and of increasing RFS, HRFS, and OS was 95%, 81%, and 80%, respectively, when the willingness-to-pay threshold was >USD 65/gross domestic product per day. Conclusion: FLS care was cost-effective in reducing refracture occurrence days for patients initially diagnosed with hip fractures.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T20:40:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b73a8222ac64404894b3f6621cec0cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6646
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T20:40:57Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-8b73a8222ac64404894b3f6621cec0cd2022-12-21T18:13:20ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462022-01-011211425433Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in TaiwanLi-Nien Chien0Yi-Fan Li1Rong-Sen Yang2Tsung-Han Yang3Yi-Han Chen4Wei-Jia Huang5Hsin-Yi Tsai6Chun-Yi Li7Ding-Cheng Chan8School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Clinical Chinese Medicine, National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, TaiwanDepartment of Orthopedics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Orthopedics, Hsinchu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu County, TaiwanSchool of Public Health, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanAmgen Taiwan Ltd, Taipei, TaiwanAmgen Taiwan Ltd, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Superintendent Office, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu County, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.25, Ln 442, Jingguo Rd, Hsinchu City 30059, Taiwan.Background: This study was to perform an economic evaluation to understand clinical outcomes and health resource use between hip fracture patients receiving hospital-based postfracture fracture liaison service (FLS) care and those receiving usual care (UC) in Taiwan. Methods: This cohort study included hospital-based data of 174 hip fracture patients who received FLS care (FLS group) from National Taiwan University Hospital, and 1697 propensity score-matched patients who received UC (UC group) of National Health Insurance claim-based data. Two groups had similar baseline characteristics but differed in hip fracture care after propensity score matching. Clinical outcomes included refracture-free survival (RFS), hip-refracture-free survival (HRFS), and overall survival (OS). Health resource use included inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs within 2 years follow-up after the index of hip fracture. The economic evaluation of the FLS model was analyzed using the net monetary benefit regression framework based on the National Health Insurance perspective. Results: The FLS group had longer RFS than the UC group, with an adjusted difference of 44.3 days (95% confidence interval: 7.2–81.4 days). Two groups did not differ in inpatient and outpatient costs during follow-up, but the FLS group had a higher expenditure than the UC group on osteoporosis-related medication. The probability of FLS being cost-effective was >80% and of increasing RFS, HRFS, and OS was 95%, 81%, and 80%, respectively, when the willingness-to-pay threshold was >USD 65/gross domestic product per day. Conclusion: FLS care was cost-effective in reducing refracture occurrence days for patients initially diagnosed with hip fractures.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664621002436Hip fractureFracture liaison service (FLS)Net monetary benefitCost-effectiveness analysis
spellingShingle Li-Nien Chien
Yi-Fan Li
Rong-Sen Yang
Tsung-Han Yang
Yi-Han Chen
Wei-Jia Huang
Hsin-Yi Tsai
Chun-Yi Li
Ding-Cheng Chan
Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Hip fracture
Fracture liaison service (FLS)
Net monetary benefit
Cost-effectiveness analysis
title Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
title_full Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
title_fullStr Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
title_short Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan
title_sort real world cost effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in taiwan
topic Hip fracture
Fracture liaison service (FLS)
Net monetary benefit
Cost-effectiveness analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664621002436
work_keys_str_mv AT linienchien realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT yifanli realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT rongsenyang realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT tsunghanyang realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT yihanchen realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT weijiahuang realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT hsinyitsai realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT chunyili realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan
AT dingchengchan realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofthefractureliaisonservicesmodelofcareforhipfractureintaiwan