Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets
The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the position of single-rooted autotransplanted teeth using computer-aided SNT drilling and conventional freehand (FT) drilling, by comparing the planned and performed position at the coronal, apical and angular level. Materials and methods: Forty sing...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/4/1012 |
| _version_ | 1797479124293386240 |
|---|---|
| author | Elena Riad Deglow Nayra Zurima Lazo Torres David Gutiérrez Muñoz María Bufalá Pérez Agustín Galparsoro Catalán Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Francesc Abella Sans Sofía Hernández Montero |
| author_facet | Elena Riad Deglow Nayra Zurima Lazo Torres David Gutiérrez Muñoz María Bufalá Pérez Agustín Galparsoro Catalán Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Francesc Abella Sans Sofía Hernández Montero |
| author_sort | Elena Riad Deglow |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the position of single-rooted autotransplanted teeth using computer-aided SNT drilling and conventional freehand (FT) drilling, by comparing the planned and performed position at the coronal, apical and angular level. Materials and methods: Forty single-root upper teeth were selected and distributed into the following study groups: A. Autotransplanted tooth using the computer-aided static navigation technique (SNT) (<i>n</i> = 20) and B. Autotransplanted tooth using the conventional free-hand technique (FT) (<i>n</i> = 20). Afterwards, the teeth were embedded into two experimental models and 10 single-root upper teeth were randomly autotransplanted in each experimental model. The experimental models were submitted to a preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and a digital impression by a 3D intraoral scan, in addition to a postoperative CBCT scan, after the autotransplantation. Datasets from postoperative CBCT scans of the two study groups were uploaded to the 3D implant planning software, aligned with the autotransplantation planning, and the coronal, apical and angular deviations were measured. The results were analysed using Student’s <i>t</i>-test and Mann–Whitney non-parametric statistical analysis. Results: Coronal (<i>p</i> = 0.079) and angular (<i>p</i> = 0.208) statistical comparisons did not present statistically significant differences; however, statistically significant differences between the apical deviation of the SNT and FT study groups (<i>p</i> = 0.038) were also observed. Conclusions: The computer-aided static navigation technique does not provide higher accuracy in the positioning of single-root autotransplanted teeth compared to the conventional free-hand technique. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T21:41:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8b7e7545c29148b0a801d546267fbf76 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-0383 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T21:41:10Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-8b7e7545c29148b0a801d546267fbf762023-11-23T20:30:20ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-02-01114101210.3390/jcm11041012Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created SocketsElena Riad Deglow0Nayra Zurima Lazo Torres1David Gutiérrez Muñoz2María Bufalá Pérez3Agustín Galparsoro Catalán4Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho5Francesc Abella Sans6Sofía Hernández Montero7Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, SpainThe aim of this study was to analyse and compare the position of single-rooted autotransplanted teeth using computer-aided SNT drilling and conventional freehand (FT) drilling, by comparing the planned and performed position at the coronal, apical and angular level. Materials and methods: Forty single-root upper teeth were selected and distributed into the following study groups: A. Autotransplanted tooth using the computer-aided static navigation technique (SNT) (<i>n</i> = 20) and B. Autotransplanted tooth using the conventional free-hand technique (FT) (<i>n</i> = 20). Afterwards, the teeth were embedded into two experimental models and 10 single-root upper teeth were randomly autotransplanted in each experimental model. The experimental models were submitted to a preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and a digital impression by a 3D intraoral scan, in addition to a postoperative CBCT scan, after the autotransplantation. Datasets from postoperative CBCT scans of the two study groups were uploaded to the 3D implant planning software, aligned with the autotransplantation planning, and the coronal, apical and angular deviations were measured. The results were analysed using Student’s <i>t</i>-test and Mann–Whitney non-parametric statistical analysis. Results: Coronal (<i>p</i> = 0.079) and angular (<i>p</i> = 0.208) statistical comparisons did not present statistically significant differences; however, statistically significant differences between the apical deviation of the SNT and FT study groups (<i>p</i> = 0.038) were also observed. Conclusions: The computer-aided static navigation technique does not provide higher accuracy in the positioning of single-root autotransplanted teeth compared to the conventional free-hand technique.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/4/1012accuracycomputed-assisted templatecomputer-aided static navigationcone-beam computed tomography scandigital impressiontooth autotransplantation |
| spellingShingle | Elena Riad Deglow Nayra Zurima Lazo Torres David Gutiérrez Muñoz María Bufalá Pérez Agustín Galparsoro Catalán Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Francesc Abella Sans Sofía Hernández Montero Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets Journal of Clinical Medicine accuracy computed-assisted template computer-aided static navigation cone-beam computed tomography scan digital impression tooth autotransplantation |
| title | Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets |
| title_full | Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets |
| title_fullStr | Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets |
| title_short | Influence of Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Autotransplanted Teeth in Surgically Created Sockets |
| title_sort | influence of static navigation technique on the accuracy of autotransplanted teeth in surgically created sockets |
| topic | accuracy computed-assisted template computer-aided static navigation cone-beam computed tomography scan digital impression tooth autotransplantation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/4/1012 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elenariaddeglow influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT nayrazurimalazotorres influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT davidgutierrezmunoz influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT mariabufalaperez influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT agustingalparsorocatalan influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT alvarozubizarretamacho influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT francescabellasans influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets AT sofiahernandezmontero influenceofstaticnavigationtechniqueontheaccuracyofautotransplantedteethinsurgicallycreatedsockets |