Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland

The effects of wood ash fertilisation on tree nutrition and growth on forested peatlands has been studied using loose ash, but in practice, ash fertilisation is done almost exclusively with granulated ash. In this study, the effects of granulated ash and loose ash (both 5 Mg ha–1) on the growth and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jyrki Hytönen, Hannu Hökkä
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2020-03-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Subjects:
_version_ 1818503645866491904
author Jyrki Hytönen
Hannu Hökkä
author_facet Jyrki Hytönen
Hannu Hökkä
author_sort Jyrki Hytönen
collection DOAJ
description The effects of wood ash fertilisation on tree nutrition and growth on forested peatlands has been studied using loose ash, but in practice, ash fertilisation is done almost exclusively with granulated ash. In this study, the effects of granulated ash and loose ash (both 5 Mg ha–1) on the growth and nutrition of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands were compared between a nitrogen-poor and a nitrogen-rich site over 15 years. On the nitrogen-rich site, wood ash application was also compared with commercial PK fertilisation. On the nitrogen-rich site, mean stand volume growth increase over unfertilised control treatment during the 15 year study period using granulated ash and commercial PK fertiliser was of the same magnitude (on average, 2.2–2.3 m3 ha–1 a–1). However, when loose ash was used growth increase over control was higher (3.7 m3 ha–1 a–1). On the nitrogen-poor site, the mean growth increase gained by loose or granulated ash (1.4–1.5 m3 ha–1 a–1) over the unfertilised control treatment was not significant. Fertilisation with loose ash or PK increased foliar P, K and B concentrations already in the first or second growing season, following fertilisation on both sites. Granulated ash increased foliar P concentrations on the nitrogen-rich site less than loose ash. After an initial increase, foliar P, K and B concentrations decreased at the end of study period. On the nitrogen-poor site, foliar P concentrations were below the deficiency limit by the end of the study period.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:26:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b7f1db478d6430e8e666f53b76cc993
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2242-4075
2242-4075
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:26:47Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
record_format Article
series Silva Fennica
spelling doaj.art-8b7f1db478d6430e8e666f53b76cc9932022-12-22T01:32:58ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752242-40752020-03-0154210.14214/sf.10259Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatlandJyrki Hytönen0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-3568Hannu Hökkä1Natural Resources Institute Finland, Natural Resources, Teknologiakatu 7, FI-67100 Kokkola, FinlandNatural Resources Institute Finland, Natural Resources, Paavo Havaksentie 3, FI-90570 Oulu, FinlandThe effects of wood ash fertilisation on tree nutrition and growth on forested peatlands has been studied using loose ash, but in practice, ash fertilisation is done almost exclusively with granulated ash. In this study, the effects of granulated ash and loose ash (both 5 Mg ha–1) on the growth and nutrition of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands were compared between a nitrogen-poor and a nitrogen-rich site over 15 years. On the nitrogen-rich site, wood ash application was also compared with commercial PK fertilisation. On the nitrogen-rich site, mean stand volume growth increase over unfertilised control treatment during the 15 year study period using granulated ash and commercial PK fertiliser was of the same magnitude (on average, 2.2–2.3 m3 ha–1 a–1). However, when loose ash was used growth increase over control was higher (3.7 m3 ha–1 a–1). On the nitrogen-poor site, the mean growth increase gained by loose or granulated ash (1.4–1.5 m3 ha–1 a–1) over the unfertilised control treatment was not significant. Fertilisation with loose ash or PK increased foliar P, K and B concentrations already in the first or second growing season, following fertilisation on both sites. Granulated ash increased foliar P concentrations on the nitrogen-rich site less than loose ash. After an initial increase, foliar P, K and B concentrations decreased at the end of study period. On the nitrogen-poor site, foliar P concentrations were below the deficiency limit by the end of the study period.pinus sylvestrisfertilisationgranulationnutritionpk fertiliserwood ash
spellingShingle Jyrki Hytönen
Hannu Hökkä
Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
Silva Fennica
pinus sylvestris
fertilisation
granulation
nutrition
pk fertiliser
wood ash
title Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
title_full Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
title_fullStr Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
title_short Comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of Scots pine on peatland
title_sort comparison of granulated and loose ash in fertilisation of scots pine on peatland
topic pinus sylvestris
fertilisation
granulation
nutrition
pk fertiliser
wood ash
work_keys_str_mv AT jyrkihytonen comparisonofgranulatedandlooseashinfertilisationofscotspineonpeatland
AT hannuhokka comparisonofgranulatedandlooseashinfertilisationofscotspineonpeatland