Methodologic quality and risk-of-bias in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a review of methods
OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions that assessed or did not methodologic quality/risk-of-bias of included studies. Additionally, to analyze methodologic features of those assessing the methodologic quality/risk-of-bias. METHODS: PubMed databa...
Main Authors: | Cristine Miron Stefani, Liliana Vicente Melo de Lucas Rezende, Lia Rosana Honnef, Luciana Butini Oliveira, Nathan da Cruz Lopes, Carla Massignan, Graziela De Luca Canto, Júlia Meller Dias de Oliveira |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/evidence/article/view/4067 |
Similar Items
-
Overcoming Personal Biases: A key for Effective Performance Appraisal
by: Nawroz Bibi Zeenat Shah, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
by: Lin-Lu Ma, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Minimizing policy-biased appraisals of the evidence on cannabis and psychosis
by: Wayne Hall
Published: (2023-01-01) -
“Unpacking” cultural differences in social anxiety between Japanese and European Americans: the roles of threat appraisal and attentional bias
by: Alexander Krieg, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis
by: Muchandifunga Trust Muchadeyi, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)