Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning

Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals comprise electrophysiological information related to muscle activity. As this signal is easy to record, it is utilized to control several myoelectric prostheses devices. Several studies have been conducted to process sEMG signals more efficiently. However, res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyun-Joon Yoo, Hyeong-jun Park, Boreom Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/10/2370
_version_ 1818035229171908608
author Hyun-Joon Yoo
Hyeong-jun Park
Boreom Lee
author_facet Hyun-Joon Yoo
Hyeong-jun Park
Boreom Lee
author_sort Hyun-Joon Yoo
collection DOAJ
description Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals comprise electrophysiological information related to muscle activity. As this signal is easy to record, it is utilized to control several myoelectric prostheses devices. Several studies have been conducted to process sEMG signals more efficiently. However, research on optimal algorithms and electrode placements for the processing of sEMG signals is still inconclusive. In addition, very few studies have focused on minimizing the number of electrodes. In this study, we investigated the most effective method for myoelectric signal classification with a small number of electrodes. A total of 23 subjects participated in the study, and the sEMG data of 14 different hand movements of the subjects were acquired from targeted muscles and untargeted muscles. Furthermore, the study compared the classification accuracy of the sEMG data using discriminative feature-oriented dictionary learning (DFDL) and other conventional classifiers. DFDL demonstrated the highest classification accuracy among the classifiers, and its higher quality performance became more apparent as the number of channels decreased. The targeted method was superior to the untargeted method, particularly when classifying sEMG signals with DFDL. Therefore, it was concluded that the combination of the targeted method and the DFDL algorithm could classify myoelectric signals more effectively with a minimal number of channels.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:51:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b8bf642a3654af3999eb29004bce527
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:51:44Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-8b8bf642a3654af3999eb29004bce5272022-12-22T01:58:33ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202019-05-011910237010.3390/s19102370s19102370Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary LearningHyun-Joon Yoo0Hyeong-jun Park1Boreom Lee2Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering (BMSE), Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, KoreaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering (BMSE), Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, KoreaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering (BMSE), Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, KoreaSurface electromyography (sEMG) signals comprise electrophysiological information related to muscle activity. As this signal is easy to record, it is utilized to control several myoelectric prostheses devices. Several studies have been conducted to process sEMG signals more efficiently. However, research on optimal algorithms and electrode placements for the processing of sEMG signals is still inconclusive. In addition, very few studies have focused on minimizing the number of electrodes. In this study, we investigated the most effective method for myoelectric signal classification with a small number of electrodes. A total of 23 subjects participated in the study, and the sEMG data of 14 different hand movements of the subjects were acquired from targeted muscles and untargeted muscles. Furthermore, the study compared the classification accuracy of the sEMG data using discriminative feature-oriented dictionary learning (DFDL) and other conventional classifiers. DFDL demonstrated the highest classification accuracy among the classifiers, and its higher quality performance became more apparent as the number of channels decreased. The targeted method was superior to the untargeted method, particularly when classifying sEMG signals with DFDL. Therefore, it was concluded that the combination of the targeted method and the DFDL algorithm could classify myoelectric signals more effectively with a minimal number of channels.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/10/2370electrodeselectromyographyprosthetic handmyoelectric controldictionary learning
spellingShingle Hyun-Joon Yoo
Hyeong-jun Park
Boreom Lee
Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
Sensors
electrodes
electromyography
prosthetic hand
myoelectric control
dictionary learning
title Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
title_full Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
title_fullStr Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
title_full_unstemmed Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
title_short Myoelectric Signal Classification of Targeted Muscles Using Dictionary Learning
title_sort myoelectric signal classification of targeted muscles using dictionary learning
topic electrodes
electromyography
prosthetic hand
myoelectric control
dictionary learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/10/2370
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunjoonyoo myoelectricsignalclassificationoftargetedmusclesusingdictionarylearning
AT hyeongjunpark myoelectricsignalclassificationoftargetedmusclesusingdictionarylearning
AT boreomlee myoelectricsignalclassificationoftargetedmusclesusingdictionarylearning