Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation

This paper is one of a series produced as part of an evaluation of a number of digital interactive television (DiTV) health pilots funded by the Department of Health during 2001/2002. This paper is concerned with two pregnancy health services produced by Channel Health and hosted on Sky television....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Nicholas, Paul Huntington, Peter Williams, Barrie Gunter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2004-12-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/129
_version_ 1811220162049736704
author David Nicholas
Paul Huntington
Peter Williams
Barrie Gunter
author_facet David Nicholas
Paul Huntington
Peter Williams
Barrie Gunter
author_sort David Nicholas
collection DOAJ
description This paper is one of a series produced as part of an evaluation of a number of digital interactive television (DiTV) health pilots funded by the Department of Health during 2001/2002. This paper is concerned with two pregnancy health services produced by Channel Health and hosted on Sky television. The study aimed to discover the success or otherwise of health information on pregnancy in this form and on this medium or ‘platform’. In particular we were interested in what kinds of people on the broader national stage viewed the Bush Babies programme. Data were obtained through a telephone questionnaire of Channel Health users. More than 250 people took part. More than 175 000 households watched the programmes, a large audience for this type of programme. Bush Babies attracted a sizeable audience with over a quarter of Channel Health viewers in this study having seen it. There proved to be marked differences between the types of people using the service and in the patterns of their use – and not always in the ways one might have expected. As expected, people who were single, older or male were less likely to view Bush Babies, while younger, married or cohabitants and females were more likely to watch the programme. More unexpectedly, perhaps, the fact that the person was pregnant was not a predictor of whether they saw a Bush Babies programme or the number of the programmes watched.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:36:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b9feb7993e4468fa06ccabb768e11e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:36:48Z
publishDate 2004-12-01
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
record_format Article
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
spelling doaj.art-8b9feb7993e4468fa06ccabb768e11e82022-12-22T03:41:54ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632004-12-0112421522610.14236/jhi.v12i4.129108Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluationDavid NicholasPaul HuntingtonPeter WilliamsBarrie GunterThis paper is one of a series produced as part of an evaluation of a number of digital interactive television (DiTV) health pilots funded by the Department of Health during 2001/2002. This paper is concerned with two pregnancy health services produced by Channel Health and hosted on Sky television. The study aimed to discover the success or otherwise of health information on pregnancy in this form and on this medium or ‘platform’. In particular we were interested in what kinds of people on the broader national stage viewed the Bush Babies programme. Data were obtained through a telephone questionnaire of Channel Health users. More than 250 people took part. More than 175 000 households watched the programmes, a large audience for this type of programme. Bush Babies attracted a sizeable audience with over a quarter of Channel Health viewers in this study having seen it. There proved to be marked differences between the types of people using the service and in the patterns of their use – and not always in the ways one might have expected. As expected, people who were single, older or male were less likely to view Bush Babies, while younger, married or cohabitants and females were more likely to watch the programme. More unexpectedly, perhaps, the fact that the person was pregnant was not a predictor of whether they saw a Bush Babies programme or the number of the programmes watched.https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/129consumer health channeldigital interactive television serviceshealth information service – pregnancy
spellingShingle David Nicholas
Paul Huntington
Peter Williams
Barrie Gunter
Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
consumer health channel
digital interactive television services
health information service – pregnancy
title Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
title_full Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
title_fullStr Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
title_short Pregnancy information and advice on Sky television: an evaluation
title_sort pregnancy information and advice on sky television an evaluation
topic consumer health channel
digital interactive television services
health information service – pregnancy
url https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/129
work_keys_str_mv AT davidnicholas pregnancyinformationandadviceonskytelevisionanevaluation
AT paulhuntington pregnancyinformationandadviceonskytelevisionanevaluation
AT peterwilliams pregnancyinformationandadviceonskytelevisionanevaluation
AT barriegunter pregnancyinformationandadviceonskytelevisionanevaluation