Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems
The article reveals content of the modern crisis of the conciliatory political systems and the growth of populism caused by it. According to author’s opinion, the crisis of the conciliatory political systems is determined by the following factors: the elitist character of the modern democracy; tr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Law
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Антиномии |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/4-19_7.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818927333545869312 |
|---|---|
| author | Viktor N. Rudenko |
| author_facet | Viktor N. Rudenko |
| author_sort | Viktor N. Rudenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article reveals content of the modern crisis of the conciliatory political
systems and the growth of populism caused by it. According to author’s opinion, the
crisis of the conciliatory political systems is determined by the following factors: the
elitist character of the modern democracy; traditional political parties’ loss of the
interest’s representation function; transformation of the social structure, in particular,
the appearance of precariat and other social groups with unprotected rights. The author
sees these processes in the context of the recent dominance of such type of rationality
as neoliberalism. He shows how neoliberal politics contributed to the destruction of the
foundations of liberal democracy, and the formation of a populist scenario of protecting
the rights of citizens. He characterizes the main features of this scenario: anti-elitism,
ethnic nationalism, and political egocentrism. The author argues that the disadvantage of
such strategy is shifting the focus from the universal concept of protecting human rights
to the particularistic concept of protecting the rights of “people”; restriction of the rights
of social groups that do not correspond to the concept of “people”; democratic extremism
and authoritarianism. In the author’s opinion, and in connection with the growth of the
populist threat, it is necessary to find ways to reconcile the interests of all social groups
in modern society |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:11:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8ba1207756064e88bd0f0f5f5f94f3c7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2686-7206 2686-925X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:11:21Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Law |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Антиномии |
| spelling | doaj.art-8ba1207756064e88bd0f0f5f5f94f3c72022-12-21T19:55:28ZengUral Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and LawАнтиномии2686-72062686-925X2019-12-0119413815510.24411/2686-7206-2019-00012Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systemsViktor N. Rudenkohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1802-2198The article reveals content of the modern crisis of the conciliatory political systems and the growth of populism caused by it. According to author’s opinion, the crisis of the conciliatory political systems is determined by the following factors: the elitist character of the modern democracy; traditional political parties’ loss of the interest’s representation function; transformation of the social structure, in particular, the appearance of precariat and other social groups with unprotected rights. The author sees these processes in the context of the recent dominance of such type of rationality as neoliberalism. He shows how neoliberal politics contributed to the destruction of the foundations of liberal democracy, and the formation of a populist scenario of protecting the rights of citizens. He characterizes the main features of this scenario: anti-elitism, ethnic nationalism, and political egocentrism. The author argues that the disadvantage of such strategy is shifting the focus from the universal concept of protecting human rights to the particularistic concept of protecting the rights of “people”; restriction of the rights of social groups that do not correspond to the concept of “people”; democratic extremism and authoritarianism. In the author’s opinion, and in connection with the growth of the populist threat, it is necessary to find ways to reconcile the interests of all social groups in modern societyhttp://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/4-19_7.pdfrconciliatory political systemliberal democracyneoliberalismpopulismhuman rights“people”“people's rights”anti-elitismethnic nationalismpolitical egocentrismdemocratic extremismauthoritarianism |
| spellingShingle | Viktor N. Rudenko Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems Антиномии rconciliatory political system liberal democracy neoliberalism populism human rights “people” “people's rights” anti-elitism ethnic nationalism political egocentrism democratic extremism authoritarianism |
| title | Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| title_full | Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| title_fullStr | Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| title_short | Populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| title_sort | populist concept for protecting human rights in the crisis of conciliatory political systems |
| topic | rconciliatory political system liberal democracy neoliberalism populism human rights “people” “people's rights” anti-elitism ethnic nationalism political egocentrism democratic extremism authoritarianism |
| url | http://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/4-19_7.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT viktornrudenko populistconceptforprotectinghumanrightsinthecrisisofconciliatorypoliticalsystems |