Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model

Abstract Using ERA5 reanalysis data from March 2021 to February 2022 and the China Meteorological Administration Global Forecasting System (CMA‐GFS) operational forecast dataset of 500 hPa geopotential height in the Northern Hemisphere in the same period, the multiscale features of forecast errors a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siyuan Sun, Li Li, Bin Zhao, Yiyi Ma, Jianglin Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Science Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1174
_version_ 1797669444841897984
author Siyuan Sun
Li Li
Bin Zhao
Yiyi Ma
Jianglin Hu
author_facet Siyuan Sun
Li Li
Bin Zhao
Yiyi Ma
Jianglin Hu
author_sort Siyuan Sun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Using ERA5 reanalysis data from March 2021 to February 2022 and the China Meteorological Administration Global Forecasting System (CMA‐GFS) operational forecast dataset of 500 hPa geopotential height in the Northern Hemisphere in the same period, the multiscale features of forecast errors are analyzed. The results indicate that the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) of 500 hPa geopotential height and its multiscale components in the Northern Hemisphere keep decreasing with the extension of forecast lead time, and there are no seasonal differences in the evolution of the ACC. The effective forecast skills by season for the CMA‐GFS model are above 6 days at multiscale, with the highest skills in winter and the planetary‐scale components. In space, significant seasonal differences are observed in the locations of the extreme values of multiscale forecast errors for 500 hPa geopotential height, and the spatial distribution of forecast errors reflects the inadequate prediction of the intensity of large‐scale trough and ridge systems at middle and high latitudes and the phase‐shift prediction of small troughs and ridges at middle latitudes. Generally, the forecast errors of the original field and planetary‐scale component show wavelike or banded distribution, and the synoptic‐scale forecast errors are always distributed in latitudinal wavelike patterns alternating between positive and negative, without significant differences in the distribution of land, sea, and terrain. The first empirical orthogonal function modes of multiscale forecast errors almost retain their respective feature. In temporal, the spring, summer, and autumn time series all have quasi‐biweekly positive and negative phase transitions within the monthly scale, and the significant phase transition in winter only occurs around January 1st. These results deepen the understanding of the distribution and possible causes of forecast errors of the CMA‐GFS model and provide ideas for the improvement and revision of the model.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T20:44:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8badf94363ce47d492a57db57dc8fd33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1530-261X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T20:44:28Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Science Letters
spelling doaj.art-8badf94363ce47d492a57db57dc8fd332023-10-01T16:45:55ZengWileyAtmospheric Science Letters1530-261X2023-10-012410n/an/a10.1002/asl.1174Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS modelSiyuan Sun0Li Li1Bin Zhao2Yiyi Ma3Jianglin Hu4CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre China Meteorological Administration Beijing ChinaCMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre China Meteorological Administration Beijing ChinaCMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre China Meteorological Administration Beijing ChinaQuzhou Meteorological Bureau Quzhou ChinaCMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre China Meteorological Administration Beijing ChinaAbstract Using ERA5 reanalysis data from March 2021 to February 2022 and the China Meteorological Administration Global Forecasting System (CMA‐GFS) operational forecast dataset of 500 hPa geopotential height in the Northern Hemisphere in the same period, the multiscale features of forecast errors are analyzed. The results indicate that the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) of 500 hPa geopotential height and its multiscale components in the Northern Hemisphere keep decreasing with the extension of forecast lead time, and there are no seasonal differences in the evolution of the ACC. The effective forecast skills by season for the CMA‐GFS model are above 6 days at multiscale, with the highest skills in winter and the planetary‐scale components. In space, significant seasonal differences are observed in the locations of the extreme values of multiscale forecast errors for 500 hPa geopotential height, and the spatial distribution of forecast errors reflects the inadequate prediction of the intensity of large‐scale trough and ridge systems at middle and high latitudes and the phase‐shift prediction of small troughs and ridges at middle latitudes. Generally, the forecast errors of the original field and planetary‐scale component show wavelike or banded distribution, and the synoptic‐scale forecast errors are always distributed in latitudinal wavelike patterns alternating between positive and negative, without significant differences in the distribution of land, sea, and terrain. The first empirical orthogonal function modes of multiscale forecast errors almost retain their respective feature. In temporal, the spring, summer, and autumn time series all have quasi‐biweekly positive and negative phase transitions within the monthly scale, and the significant phase transition in winter only occurs around January 1st. These results deepen the understanding of the distribution and possible causes of forecast errors of the CMA‐GFS model and provide ideas for the improvement and revision of the model.https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1174500 hPa geopotential heightCMA‐GFSerror diagnosticmultiscale
spellingShingle Siyuan Sun
Li Li
Bin Zhao
Yiyi Ma
Jianglin Hu
Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
Atmospheric Science Letters
500 hPa geopotential height
CMA‐GFS
error diagnostic
multiscale
title Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
title_full Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
title_fullStr Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
title_full_unstemmed Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
title_short Multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hPa geopotential height for the CMA‐GFS model
title_sort multiscale feature analysis of forecast errors of 500 hpa geopotential height for the cma gfs model
topic 500 hPa geopotential height
CMA‐GFS
error diagnostic
multiscale
url https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1174
work_keys_str_mv AT siyuansun multiscalefeatureanalysisofforecasterrorsof500hpageopotentialheightforthecmagfsmodel
AT lili multiscalefeatureanalysisofforecasterrorsof500hpageopotentialheightforthecmagfsmodel
AT binzhao multiscalefeatureanalysisofforecasterrorsof500hpageopotentialheightforthecmagfsmodel
AT yiyima multiscalefeatureanalysisofforecasterrorsof500hpageopotentialheightforthecmagfsmodel
AT jianglinhu multiscalefeatureanalysisofforecasterrorsof500hpageopotentialheightforthecmagfsmodel