Using the Multi-Response Method with Desirability Functions to Optimize the Zinc Electroplating of Steel Screws

Zinc electroplating is a coating process controlled by several input process parameters. However, the commonly used input parameters for setting the process of zinc deposition are current density, temperature of the coating solution, zinc concentration, deposition time, and concentration of additive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruben Lostado Lorza, María Ángeles Martínez Calvo, Carlos Berlanga Labari, Pedro J. Rivero Fuente
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/8/9/711
Description
Summary:Zinc electroplating is a coating process controlled by several input process parameters. However, the commonly used input parameters for setting the process of zinc deposition are current density, temperature of the coating solution, zinc concentration, deposition time, and concentration of additives (conditioner and brightener). The power consumed in the zinc plating process, coating thickness, increase in coating mass, and corrosion resistance are considered to be outputs or zinc coating parameters. They are widely used when the zinc coating requirements are based on the coating process cost, coating process speed, corrosion resistance, and coating thickness. This paper seeks to determine regression models by the response surface method (RSM) that relate the zinc coating parameters to the input parameters in steel screws. When considering the coating requirements of cost, coating process speed, corrosion resistance, and coating thickness, the optimal input parameters were found by using a multi-response surface (MRS). Input parameters of 0.3 amps/dm2, 20.0 °C, 13.9 g/L, 45 min, 28.5 mL/L, and 2.8 mL/L, respectively (relative to the commonly used input parameters detailed above), were obtained when considering the cost. Considering minimization of the deposition time, the input parameters obtained were 0.5 amps/dm2, 24.6 °C, 13.9 g/L, 45 min, 26.9 mL/L, and 1.1 mL/L, respectively. The optimal inputs to maximize the corrosion resistance were 0.6 amps/dm2, 32.4 °C, 14.0 g/L, 45 min, 28.7 mL/L, and 2.5 mL/L, respectively. Finally, when maximizing the coating thickness, the inputs were 0.7 amps/dm2, 38.4 °C, 12.2 g/L, 45 min, 26.5 mL/L, and 1.5 mL/L, respectively.
ISSN:2075-4701