On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata

The present paper deals with eight charges that are frequently leveled against any research that focuses on the agrapha dogmata. The charges are demonstrated to be completely unfounded and, therefore, duly dismissed. In particular, it is argued here that the phrase ta legomena (so‑called) is by no m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas A. Szlezák
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan 2010-12-01
Series:Peitho
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/peitho/article/view/7822
_version_ 1818415186794512384
author Thomas A. Szlezák
author_facet Thomas A. Szlezák
author_sort Thomas A. Szlezák
collection DOAJ
description The present paper deals with eight charges that are frequently leveled against any research that focuses on the agrapha dogmata. The charges are demonstrated to be completely unfounded and, therefore, duly dismissed. In particular, it is argued here that the phrase ta legomena (so‑called) is by no means to be understood as ironic. Consequently, the article rejects the very common picture of Plato as some sort of dogma‑ tist and author of a fixed philosophical system. However, Plato’s philoso‑ phy is presented as rather ‘overt’ and ‘straightforward’ in its nature. With the situation being as it is, thorough knowledge of the agrapha dogmata is shown to be an absolute prerequisite for understanding Plato’s dialogues. The paper concludes with an observation that while investigating the issue is completely warranted and does not in any way entail any devaluation of the dialogues, Aristotle’s testimony must also be taken into account.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:31:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bb242a99b914ad9a16070463a83ecc9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2082-7539
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:31:00Z
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
record_format Article
series Peitho
spelling doaj.art-8bb242a99b914ad9a16070463a83ecc92022-12-21T23:03:18ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz University, PoznanPeitho2082-75392010-12-011110.14746/pea.2010.1.47609On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha DogmataThomas A. SzlezákThe present paper deals with eight charges that are frequently leveled against any research that focuses on the agrapha dogmata. The charges are demonstrated to be completely unfounded and, therefore, duly dismissed. In particular, it is argued here that the phrase ta legomena (so‑called) is by no means to be understood as ironic. Consequently, the article rejects the very common picture of Plato as some sort of dogma‑ tist and author of a fixed philosophical system. However, Plato’s philoso‑ phy is presented as rather ‘overt’ and ‘straightforward’ in its nature. With the situation being as it is, thorough knowledge of the agrapha dogmata is shown to be an absolute prerequisite for understanding Plato’s dialogues. The paper concludes with an observation that while investigating the issue is completely warranted and does not in any way entail any devaluation of the dialogues, Aristotle’s testimony must also be taken into account.https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/peitho/article/view/7822agrapha dogmataPlato’s indirect traditionthe theory of principlesesotericismAristotle
spellingShingle Thomas A. Szlezák
On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
Peitho
agrapha dogmata
Plato’s indirect tradition
the theory of principles
esotericism
Aristotle
title On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
title_full On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
title_fullStr On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
title_full_unstemmed On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
title_short On the Standard Aversion to the Agrapha Dogmata
title_sort on the standard aversion to the agrapha dogmata
topic agrapha dogmata
Plato’s indirect tradition
the theory of principles
esotericism
Aristotle
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/peitho/article/view/7822
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasaszlezak onthestandardaversiontotheagraphadogmata