Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community
The arrival order of different species to a habitat can strongly impact community assembly and succession dynamics, thus influencing functionality. In this study, we asked how prior colonization of one community member would influence the assembly of a synergistic multispecies biofilm community grow...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01949/full |
_version_ | 1818351761606311936 |
---|---|
author | Nanna Mee Coops Olsen Henriette Lyng Røder Jakob Russel Jonas Stenløkke Madsen Søren Johannes Sørensen Mette Burmølle |
author_facet | Nanna Mee Coops Olsen Henriette Lyng Røder Jakob Russel Jonas Stenløkke Madsen Søren Johannes Sørensen Mette Burmølle |
author_sort | Nanna Mee Coops Olsen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The arrival order of different species to a habitat can strongly impact community assembly and succession dynamics, thus influencing functionality. In this study, we asked how prior colonization of one community member would influence the assembly of a synergistic multispecies biofilm community grown in vitro. We expected that the prior arrival would confer an advantage, in particular for good biofilm formers. Yet, we did not know if the cohabitants would be impaired or benefit from the pre-colonization of one member, depending on its ability to form biofilm. We used a consortium consisting of four soil bacteria; Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, Xanthomonas retroflexus, Microbacterium oxydans and Paenibacillus amylolyticus. This consortium has been shown to act synergistically when grown together, thus increasing biofilm production. The results showed that the two good biofilm formers gained a fitness advantage (increase in abundance) when allowed prior colonization on an abiotic surface before the arrival of their cohabitants. Interestingly, the significantly higher number of the pre-colonized biofilm formers did not affect the resulting composition in the subsequent biofilm after 24 h. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:42:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8bdfc38a0edd404e8db05a53df2368f0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-302X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:42:53Z |
publishDate | 2019-08-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Microbiology |
spelling | doaj.art-8bdfc38a0edd404e8db05a53df2368f02022-12-21T23:35:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2019-08-011010.3389/fmicb.2019.01949447411Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm CommunityNanna Mee Coops OlsenHenriette Lyng RøderJakob RusselJonas Stenløkke MadsenSøren Johannes SørensenMette BurmølleThe arrival order of different species to a habitat can strongly impact community assembly and succession dynamics, thus influencing functionality. In this study, we asked how prior colonization of one community member would influence the assembly of a synergistic multispecies biofilm community grown in vitro. We expected that the prior arrival would confer an advantage, in particular for good biofilm formers. Yet, we did not know if the cohabitants would be impaired or benefit from the pre-colonization of one member, depending on its ability to form biofilm. We used a consortium consisting of four soil bacteria; Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, Xanthomonas retroflexus, Microbacterium oxydans and Paenibacillus amylolyticus. This consortium has been shown to act synergistically when grown together, thus increasing biofilm production. The results showed that the two good biofilm formers gained a fitness advantage (increase in abundance) when allowed prior colonization on an abiotic surface before the arrival of their cohabitants. Interestingly, the significantly higher number of the pre-colonized biofilm formers did not affect the resulting composition in the subsequent biofilm after 24 h.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01949/fullmultispecies biofilmsinterspecies interactionscommunity assemblypriority effectssynergy |
spellingShingle | Nanna Mee Coops Olsen Henriette Lyng Røder Jakob Russel Jonas Stenløkke Madsen Søren Johannes Sørensen Mette Burmølle Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community Frontiers in Microbiology multispecies biofilms interspecies interactions community assembly priority effects synergy |
title | Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community |
title_full | Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community |
title_fullStr | Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community |
title_full_unstemmed | Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community |
title_short | Priority of Early Colonizers but No Effect on Cohabitants in a Synergistic Biofilm Community |
title_sort | priority of early colonizers but no effect on cohabitants in a synergistic biofilm community |
topic | multispecies biofilms interspecies interactions community assembly priority effects synergy |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01949/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nannameecoopsolsen priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity AT henriettelyngrøder priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity AT jakobrussel priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity AT jonasstenløkkemadsen priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity AT sørenjohannessørensen priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity AT metteburmølle priorityofearlycolonizersbutnoeffectoncohabitantsinasynergisticbiofilmcommunity |