Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?

A virtual occlusal adjustment in orthognathic surgery has many advantages; however, the haptic information offered by plaster casts is missing when using intraoral scans. Feeling the interferences may be helpful in defining the best possible occlusion. Whether the use of a virtual occlusal adjustmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Awad, Andy Häfner, Siegmar Reinert, Susanne Kluba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/8/1288
_version_ 1797432038682263552
author Daniel Awad
Andy Häfner
Siegmar Reinert
Susanne Kluba
author_facet Daniel Awad
Andy Häfner
Siegmar Reinert
Susanne Kluba
author_sort Daniel Awad
collection DOAJ
description A virtual occlusal adjustment in orthognathic surgery has many advantages; however, the haptic information offered by plaster casts is missing when using intraoral scans. Feeling the interferences may be helpful in defining the best possible occlusion. Whether the use of a virtual occlusal adjustment instead of the conventional approach has a significant effect on the postsurgical position of the jaws is a question that remains unanswered. This study compares a virtual method to the conventional method of defining the final occlusion. Twenty-five orthognathic patients were included. Bimaxillary and single-jaw orthognathic surgery (mandible only) was simulated. The two methods were compared regarding discrepancies in the simulated postsurgical position of the mandible, measured three-dimensionally using MeshLab (MeshLab 2020.12 3D). An analysis using SPSS revealed no significant differences between the tested methods (<i>p</i>-values: 0.580 to 0.713). The mean absolute discrepancies ranged from 0.14 mm to 0.72 mm, laying within the scope of the clinically acceptable inaccuracies of an osteosynthesis in orthognathic surgery. The lack of haptic information in virtual planning had no relevant influence on the definition of the final occlusion and the simulated postsurgical outcome. However, in individual cases, plaster models might still be helpful in finding the adequate occlusion, especially in the sagittal dimension and in cases of patients with an anterior open bite, but this remains to be tested.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:53:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8be1861655294bbb8b12d2b7b1c404fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:53:59Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8be1861655294bbb8b12d2b7b1c404fb2023-12-01T23:52:52ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262022-08-01128128810.3390/jpm12081288Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?Daniel Awad0Andy Häfner1Siegmar Reinert2Susanne Kluba3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Osianderstr. 2–8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Osianderstr. 2–8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Osianderstr. 2–8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Osianderstr. 2–8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyA virtual occlusal adjustment in orthognathic surgery has many advantages; however, the haptic information offered by plaster casts is missing when using intraoral scans. Feeling the interferences may be helpful in defining the best possible occlusion. Whether the use of a virtual occlusal adjustment instead of the conventional approach has a significant effect on the postsurgical position of the jaws is a question that remains unanswered. This study compares a virtual method to the conventional method of defining the final occlusion. Twenty-five orthognathic patients were included. Bimaxillary and single-jaw orthognathic surgery (mandible only) was simulated. The two methods were compared regarding discrepancies in the simulated postsurgical position of the mandible, measured three-dimensionally using MeshLab (MeshLab 2020.12 3D). An analysis using SPSS revealed no significant differences between the tested methods (<i>p</i>-values: 0.580 to 0.713). The mean absolute discrepancies ranged from 0.14 mm to 0.72 mm, laying within the scope of the clinically acceptable inaccuracies of an osteosynthesis in orthognathic surgery. The lack of haptic information in virtual planning had no relevant influence on the definition of the final occlusion and the simulated postsurgical outcome. However, in individual cases, plaster models might still be helpful in finding the adequate occlusion, especially in the sagittal dimension and in cases of patients with an anterior open bite, but this remains to be tested.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/8/1288orthognathic surgeryorthodonticsvirtual occlusionintraoral scansdigital surgery
spellingShingle Daniel Awad
Andy Häfner
Siegmar Reinert
Susanne Kluba
Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
Journal of Personalized Medicine
orthognathic surgery
orthodontics
virtual occlusion
intraoral scans
digital surgery
title Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
title_full Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
title_fullStr Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
title_short Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
title_sort plaster casts vs intraoral scans do different methods of determining the final occlusion affect the simulated outcome in orthognathic surgery
topic orthognathic surgery
orthodontics
virtual occlusion
intraoral scans
digital surgery
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/8/1288
work_keys_str_mv AT danielawad plastercastsvsintraoralscansdodifferentmethodsofdeterminingthefinalocclusionaffectthesimulatedoutcomeinorthognathicsurgery
AT andyhafner plastercastsvsintraoralscansdodifferentmethodsofdeterminingthefinalocclusionaffectthesimulatedoutcomeinorthognathicsurgery
AT siegmarreinert plastercastsvsintraoralscansdodifferentmethodsofdeterminingthefinalocclusionaffectthesimulatedoutcomeinorthognathicsurgery
AT susannekluba plastercastsvsintraoralscansdodifferentmethodsofdeterminingthefinalocclusionaffectthesimulatedoutcomeinorthognathicsurgery